临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 572-574.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.06.023

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于单中心的不同手术组人员成人腹股沟疝修补术现状调查

  

  1. 陕西省人民医院普外科
  • 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-06-20

Investigation of adult inguinal hernia repair in different surgical groups based on single center

  • Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-06-20

摘要: 目的:调查西部某三甲医院成人腹股沟疝修补术的手术开展情况,了解该院不同病区手术组间成人腹股沟疝的治疗现状。方法:对该院2017年11月~2018年4月间不同病区手术组开展的成人腹股沟疝手术病例进行回顾性调查。根据医院设置,手术组分为病区A、B两组,将A、B组间的手术方式、麻醉方式、手术时间、住院时间以及术后并发症进行比较,分析各两组间差异。结果:A、B组间腔镜疝手术百分比分别为68%、62%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A、B组间开放手术中采用局麻方式比例分别为47%、15%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组腔镜疝(单侧)修补术手术时间为(151.46±34.71)分钟,B组为(97.56±25.90)分钟,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组开放疝(单侧)修补术手术时间为(90.40±19.05)分钟、B组为(95.64±25.34)分钟,两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有调查对象中,腔镜疝修补术平均住院时间为(4.90±2.17)天;开放疝修补术平均住院时间(5.81±3.29)天,两组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A、B组间手术并发症发生率均为0(P>0.05)。结论:该院腔镜疝修补术是大多数手术组手术方式的主要选择,不同组间的手术相关指标存在一定差异,间接反映出西部地区目前成人腹股沟疝治疗的实际情况。

关键词: 成人;腹股沟疝修补术;现状 ,  

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the operation development of adult inguinal hernia repair in a thirdclass hospital in west China and to understand the current treatment situation of adult inguinal hernia in different wards operation groups in this hospital.Methods:Retrospective investigation was made on adult inguinal hernia surgery cases carried out by two surgical groups in this hospital from November 2017 to April 2018.According to the hospital settings,the operation groups are divided into two areas A and B,the operation methods,anesthesia methods,operation time,hospitalization time and postoperative complications in different operation groups are compared,and the differences between different groups are analyzed.Results:The percentage of endoscopic hernia surgery in groups A and B was 68% and 62%,respectively,with no significant difference(P>0.05).The percentage of local anesthesia used in open operation in wards A and B was 47% and 15%,respectively(P<0.05).The operation time of endoscopic hernia repair(Unilateral)in group A was(151.46±34.71)min,in group B was(97.56±25.90)min(P<0.05).The operation time of open hernioplasty(Unilateral) in group A was(90.40±19.05)min,in group B was(95.64±25.34)min,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Among all the investigated subjects,the average hospitalization time of patients with endoscopic hernia repair was(4.90±2.17)days.The average hospitalization time of patients with open herniorrhaphy was(5.81±3.29)days,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of surgical complications between groups A and B was 0(P>0.05).〖WTHZ〗Conclusion:In this hospital,endoscopic herniorrhaphy is the main choice of surgical methods in most surgical groups,and there are some differences in surgical related indicators between different groups,which indirectly reflects the actual situation of adult inguinal hernia treatment in western region at present,and provides a sample reference for the quality control system of hernia treatment in China.

Key words: adult, inguinal hernia repair, present situation

[1] 张清河, 宋康颉, 潘绪科. 胰腺损伤六例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 562-563.
[2] 吴琼, 范洲, 丁召等. 顺蠕动侧侧肠吻合和功能性端端肠吻合在Crohn's病消化道重建中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 447-450.
[3] 王松, 谢秋萍, 王平. 全腔镜甲状腺手术热点与难点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 224-226.
[4] 孙先龙, 赵礼金, 蒋继昌. 胆总管神经内分泌肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 199-200.
[5] 李欣龙, 顾立虎, 祝和攀, 潘军海, 陈玉萍. 加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 404-407.
[6] 方坤, 罗明尧, 赵嘉伟, 薛云飞, 舒畅. 3D导航技术在主动脉腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 938-942.
[7] 吴洋, 窦娟, 乔芊芊等. 超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞对多发肋骨骨折术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 984-986.
[8] 王国义 梁剑峰 田锦林 鲍峰. 内镜直视与X线透视下支架置入术治疗晚期食管贲门癌临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 679-682.
[9] 马跃峰 邢鑫 马震川 孔冉冉 孙良璋 乔哲 李少民. 术中肋间神经阻滞联合术后静脉使用镇痛泵对开胸术后镇痛效果的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 686-688.
[10] 张亦超 熊涛 陈淑娟 胡航 丁召 钱群. 痔上黏膜环切术后并发直肠囊肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 720-720.
[11] 彭银杰 李印 陈威鹏 凃成志 袁俊 马海波 秦建军. 老年cT1N0M0食管癌病人内镜和手术治疗预后分析:基于SEER数据库[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 651-656.
[12] 陈传贵 段晓峰 姜宏景. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助对比胸腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 715-718.
[13] 谭锋维 薛奇 牟巨伟 高禹舜 毛友生 王大力 赵峻李宁 王镇 高树庚 赫捷. 从最新指南解读食管胃交界部腺癌的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 641-643.
[14] 陆超敬 洪江 李鑫 杨立信. 经口置入钉砧头系统在颈段及胸上段食管癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 662-664.
[15] 邹文彬 邓豫 付向宁 吴骁伟. 分层缝合加带蒂大网膜包埋在食管良性破裂修补术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 665-667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 钱群. 出口梗阻型便秘手术治疗风险控制 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 413 .
[2] 赵军. 肺癌靶向治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 514 .
[3] 陈光侠;何晓华;吴倩倩;等. 丙酮酸激酶M2蛋白表达与各期胃癌临床病理特征及预后的相关性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(11): 859 .
[4] 颛孙迪迪;冯杰雄. 大数据时代下先天性巨结肠临床研究的展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 885 .
[5] 陈晋;王晓龙;朱日祥. 影响肝癌合并门脉高压症患者行R0切除的疗效、安全性及预后的因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(3): 182 .
[6] 张韬 张小明. 肾癌并发下腔静脉瘤栓的处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 801 -804 .
[7] 陈沛锐, 卿秋杉, 车国卫等. 术前胸中上段食管癌颈部淋巴结转移相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 566 -569 .
[8] 涂俊, 瞿广桥. MRI定量增强参数与乳腺癌预后因子及分子分型的相关性及其临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 859 -861 .
[9] 崔振鹏, 罗林, 刘山, 范清萍, 张杜平, 刘鸿燕, 毛文博, 刘鹤. 缩短输尿管软镜术前双J管留置时间对直径<1.5 cm上尿路结石病人的疗效及预后评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 160 -162 .
[10] 董明. 结直肠癌围手术期营养治疗的几个问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 485 -488 .