临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 706-710.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20260049

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于经胸超声的容量与心功能评估在急诊手术及老年病人麻醉管理中的应用价值

黄玮,邓文强,王鹏涛,刘丽,西尔艾力·麦麦提   

  1. 新疆维吾尔自治区第三人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-15 出版日期:2026-08-18 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 邓文强
  • 作者简介:黄玮,邓文强,王鹏涛,刘丽,西尔艾力·麦麦提
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区卫生健康委员会“天山英才”医药卫生高层次人才培养计划(TSYC202301B085)

Application value of volume and cardiac function assessment based on transthoracic ultrasound in anesthesia management of elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery

HUANG Wei,DENG Wenqiang,WANG Pengtao,LIU Li,XIeraili·Maimaiti   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,the Third People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
  • Received:2026-01-15 Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-08-18

摘要: 目的 探讨基于经胸超声的容量与心功能评估在急诊手术及老年病人麻醉管理中的应用价值。方法 2022年3月~2025年3月拟行急诊手术的老年病人360例,采用计算机随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组180例。观察组通过经胸超声和经食道超声扫查评估容量与心功能并指导麻醉管理,对照组实施常规麻醉管理。比较两组病人不同时间点血流动力学指标[包括麻醉诱导前、手术开始时、离室时的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)]、临床相关指标(包括手术时间、术中液体入量、术中尿量、血管活性药物使用剂量)、影像学及超声相关指标[包括胸腔积液、气胸、盆腹腔积液等异常情况检出率,以及胸骨旁左室舒张末期面积(LVEDA)、下腔静脉直径(IVC)、右心室舒张末期面积(RVEDA)、三尖瓣环收缩期位移(TAPSE)]、术后相关指标(术后拔管时间、ICU入住率、并发症发生率、住院总费用)。结果 麻醉诱导前,两组病人MAP、HR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组手术开始时及离室时,MAP分别为(86.58±5.74)mmHg和(88.25±5.96)mmHg,高于对照组的(82.35±6.18)mmHg和(84.15±6.27)mmHg,HR分别为(98.65±8.74)次/分、(102.36±9.12)次/分,低于对照组的(105.82±9.21)次/分和(108.75±9.58)次/分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术中液体入量为(1851.35±325.68)ml,少于对照组的(2140.73±358.24)ml,血管活性药物使用剂量为5.23(3.28,6.81)mg,低于对照组的8.65(6.47,10.74)mg,尿量为(425.68±102.35)ml,高于对照组的(368.95±92.74)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组胸腔积液、气胸、盆腹腔积液等异常情况总检出率为31.11% ,高于对照组的 19.44%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术中超声监测后5分钟与离室前的胸骨旁LVEDA、IVC、RVEDA、TAPSE比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后拔管时间为(6.35±2.18)小时,短于对照组的(8.69±2.51)小时,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后入住ICU率为6.67%,并发症发生率为5.56%,低于对照组的15.56%和13.89%,住院总费用为(35291.74±5242.27)元,少于对照组的(43918.80±6215.58)元,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 基于经胸超声的容量与心功能评估应用于急诊手术及老年病人麻醉管理,可有效维持病人术中血流动力学稳定,提高异常情况检出率,减少术中液体入量及血管活性药物使用,缩短术后拔管时间,降低术后并发症发生率及住院费用。

关键词: 经胸超声; 容量评估; 心功能评估; 急诊手术; 老年病人; 麻醉管理

Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of volume and cardiac function assessment based on transthoracic ultrasound for emergency surgery and anesthesia management in elderly patients. Methods A total of 360 elderly patients scheduled for emergency surgery in our hospital from March 2022 to March 2025 were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into an observation group and a control group with 180 cases in each group using the computer random number table method.The observation group received volume and cardiac function assessment via transthoracic ultrasound and transesophageal ultrasound to guide anesthesia management,while the control group was given routine anesthesia management.The two groups were compared in terms of hemodynamic indicators at different time points [including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) before anesthesia induction,at the start of surgery and before leaving the operating room],clinical related indicators (including operation time,intraoperative fluid intake,intraoperative urine output and dosage of vasoactive drugs),imaging and ultrasound related indicators [including the detection rate of abnormalities such as pleural effusion,pneumothorax and abdominopelvic effusion,as well as parasternal left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA),inferior vena cava diameter (IVC),right ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)],and postoperative related indicators (postoperative extubation time,ICU admission rate,complication rate and total hospitalization cost). Results There was no statistically significant difference in MAP and HR between the two groups before anesthesia induction (P>0.05).At the start of surgery and before leaving the operating room,the MAP of the observation group [(86.58±5.74) mmHg and (88.25±5.96) mmHg] was higher than that of the control group [(82.35±6.18) mmHg and (84.15±6.27) mmHg],and the HR [(98.65±8.74) beats/min and (102.36±9.12) beats/min] was lower than that of the control group [(105.82±9.21) beats/min and (108.75±9.58) beats/min],with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The intraoperative fluid intake [(1 851.35±325.68) ml] and dosage of vasoactive drugs [5.23 (3.28,6.81) mg] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group [(2 140.73±358.24) ml and 8.65 (6.47,10.74) mg],while the urine output [(425.68±102.35) ml] was higher than that in the control group [(368.95±92.74) ml] (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05).The total detection rate of abnormalities such as pleural effusion,pneumothorax and abdominopelvic effusion in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (31.11% vs. 19.44%,P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in parasternal LVEDA,IVC,RVEDA and TAPSE at 5 minutes after intraoperative ultrasound monitoring and before leaving the operating room between the two groups(P>0.05).The postoperative extubation time [(6.35±2.18) h] of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group [(8.69±2.51) h],the postoperative ICU admission rate (6.67% vs. 15.56%) and complication rate (5.56% vs. 13.89%) were lower than those of the control group,and the total hospitalization cost [(35 291.74±5 242.27) yuan] was less than that of the control group [(43 918.80±6 215.58) yuan] (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of transthoracic ultrasound-based volume and cardiac function assessment for emergency surgery and anesthesia management in elderly patients can effectively maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability,improve the detection rate of abnormalities,reduce intraoperative fluid intake and the use of vasoactive drugs,shorten postoperative extubation time,and decrease postoperative complication rate and hospitalization cost.

Key words: transthoracic ultrasound; volume assessment; cardiac function assessment; emergency surgery; elderly patients; anesthesia management

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李颢;叶达夫;李京涛;等. 双镜联合二期治疗尿道球部断裂一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 878 .
[2] 沈攀;刘琳. D1和D2淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌合并失代偿性肝硬化的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 940 .
[3] 王勇 罗文 段鑫 . 腹腔镜下全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补手术的规范化问题 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 316 .
[4] 冯小仍;陈滨;余斌. 骨盆后环骨折内固定方式的稳定性探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 332 -0 .
[5] 马睿锐;陶元生;谌雁冰等. CO2气腹对人胃癌细胞株SGC7901增殖和转移能力的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 362 -0 .
[6] 曾杨军;胡万里;程龙等. 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术和电切术治疗良性前列腺增生对性功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 386 -0 .
[7] 王毓锋;李涛;林锐等. 老年重症急性非结石性胆囊炎患者手术时机及方式的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 599 .
[8] 庄瑜;毛建强;杨迪成;等. 心脏再次手术行瓣膜置换的体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(1): 49 .
[9] 李涛;魏世东;孙劲文;等. 结节性甲状腺肿合并多灶性甲状腺微小乳头状癌23例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(11): 843 .
[10] 茹新宇;柯梦;丁召等. 应用视频辅助下肛瘘治疗技术的肛瘘微创治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 898 .