临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 688-691.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250922

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

肩袖缝合术后关节僵硬危险因素及基于解剖学指标的预测模型构建

杜武军,姜劲松   

  1. 山西医科大学附属运城市中心医院运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-18 出版日期:2026-08-18 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 姜劲松
  • 作者简介:杜武军,姜劲松

Risk factors of joint stiffness after rotator cuff suture and prediction model based on anatomical indicators construction

DU Wujun,JIANG Jinsong   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine,Yuncheng Central Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University
  • Received:2025-09-18 Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-08-18

摘要: 目的 探讨肩袖缝合术后关节僵硬危险因素并构建基于解剖学指标的预测模型。方法 2018年1月~2024年1月接受肩袖缝合术治疗的病人227例,根据术后6个月是否发生关节僵硬分为僵硬组(47例)和未僵硬组(180例);使用单因素以及多因素方法分析肩袖缝合术后关节僵硬的独立危险因素,构建相应的预测模型进行预测效能分析。结果 僵硬组术前肩关节僵硬比例为74.47%,术后肩峰指数为0.73±0.02,术后肩峰外侧角为(68.94±5.37)度,非僵硬组分别为24.44%、0.71±0.02、(75.09±5.95)度,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,术前肩关节僵硬(OR=0.107,95%CI 0.045~0.256)、术后更大肩峰指数(OR=7.064,95%CI 4.764~10.475)及术后更小肩峰外侧角(OR=0.835,95%CI 0.775~0.900)是术后关节僵硬的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于上述因素构建列线图模型,内部验证(227例)与外部验证(50例)的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.894和0.776。结论 接受肩袖缝合术病人如术前存在肩关节僵硬、术后早期肩峰指数过大或肩峰外侧角过小则更易在术后发生关节僵硬;利用以上因素构建的列线图预测模型对于病人关节僵硬的预测显示出良好的效能。

关键词: 肩袖缝合术; 关节僵硬; 解剖学

Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors of joint stiffness after rotator cuff suture and construct a prediction model based on anatomical indicators. Methods 227 patients who underwent rotator cuff suture in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2024 were retrospectively included and were divided into the stiffness group (47 cases) and the non-stiffness group (180 cases) based on whether joint stiffness occurred 6 months after surgery or not.Use single factor and multi factor methods to analyze independent risk factors for joint stiffness after rotator cuff suturing surgery.Construct corresponding prediction models for predictive performance analysis. Results Compared with the non-stiff group (24.44%,0.71±0.02,and 75.09±5.95° respectively),the stiff group showed statistically significant differences in the preoperative shoulder joint stiffness rate (74.47%),postoperative acromial index (0.73±0.02),and postoperative lateral acromial angle (68.94±5.37)°,with all P-values less than 0.05.Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative shoulder joint stiffness (OR=0.107,95%CI 0.045~0.256),a higher postoperative acromial index (OR=7.064,95%CI 4.764~10.475),and a smaller postoperative lateral acromial angle (OR=0.835,95%CI 0.775~0.900) were all independent risk factors for postoperative joint stiffness (all P<0.05).A nomogram model was constructed based on the above factors,and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for internal validation (nP=227) and external validation (nP=50) were 0.894 and 0.776,respectively. Conclusion Patients undergoing rotator cuff suture who have shoulder joint stiffness before the operation,excessive acromial index or smaller lateral acromial angle in the early postoperative period are more likely to develop joint stiffness after surgery.The column chart prediction model constructed using the above factors has shown good performance in predicting joint stiffness in patients.

Key words: rotator cuff suture; joint stiffness; anatomy

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[2] 张庭保;欧阳和平;孙登江等 . 脑脊液持续引流结合鞘内注射治疗术后颅内G-杆菌感染 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 440 .
[3] 雷尚通. 甲状腺系膜切除术—基于解剖层面的手术技术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(11): 823 .
[4] 宾永焰;郭义城. 桡骨小头半脱位合并尺骨鹰嘴骨折一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(3): 197 .
[5] 高永顺;刘吉福. 心脏外科手术后胸骨切口深部感染的治疗经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(5): 337 .
[6] 林明飞;曹东明. 乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术后并发症分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(1): 66 .
[7] 姬乐 刘涛 白浪 高永涛. 腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术对老年进展期胃癌病人CEA、DDC及血清HIF1α、MACC1的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 739 -743 .
[8] 林海鹏 卢晓明 王莉霞 牛彦锋. 沉默信息调节因子7在胃癌组织的表达及其与胃癌临床病理的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 744 -746 .
[9] 陶海鹰 喻剑舟 卫爱林 杨博 杨俭. 后路椎板切除手术治疗脊柱椎管内神经鞘瘤的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 783 -786 .
[10] 胡俊杰 熊治国. 肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗在结直肠癌腹膜转移中的应用现状及前景[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 727 -730 .