临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 46-49.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250104

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳清蛋白和维生素D联合抗阻运动改善老年食管癌病人肌肉减少症的临床研究

袁甜甜,李青荷,吴翠干,袁丽娟,万淑华,徐正君   

  1. 224055 江苏盐城,南京医科大学盐城临床医学院,盐城市第三人民医院心胸外科,介入放射科(袁甜甜、袁丽娟、徐正君),护理部(李青荷、吴翠干),胸外科(万淑华)
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-07 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 徐正君,Email:971878566@qq.com

Clinical study of Whey protein and vitamin D combined anti-resistance exercise to improvesarcopenia in elderly patients with esophageal cancer

YUAN Tiantian*,LI Qinghe,WU Cuigan,YUAN Lijuan,WAN Shuhua,XU Zhengjun   

  1. *Department of General Surgery,Tianyou Hospital,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,Hubei 430000,China
  • Received:2025-02-07 Online:2026-03-05 Published:2026-01-20

摘要: 目的探讨乳清蛋白和维生素D联合抗阻运动改善老年食管癌病人肌肉减少症的临床效果。方法2023年6月~2024年8月于我院接受治疗的食管癌合并肌肉减少症病人76例,根据营养支持方案的不同分为对照组(38例)和观察组(38例),对照组行常规营养支持治疗,观察组行乳清蛋白和维生素D联合抗阻运动治疗。采用主观整体评估量表(PG-SGA)评估两组病人的营养状况,食管癌特异性量表(QLQ-OES18)评估两组病人的生活质量,并比较两组病人血浆白蛋白(ALB)、血红蛋白(Hb)和C-反应蛋白(CRP)的水平,骨骼肌质量指数、握力和步速等骨骼肌相关指标,以及并发症发生率。结果术后3个月,观察组PG-SGA评分为(11.54±2.03)分,低于对照组的(13.11±1.97)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。QLQ-OES18量表显示,观察组吞咽功能评分为(67.43±4.89)分,高于对照组的(64.69±4.26)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组进食不适、疼痛和反流评分分别为(56.47±4.69)分、(57.28±5.18)分和(54.94±4.87),低于对照组的(59.51±4.75)分、(60.44±5.05)分和(57.29±5.03)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组ALB和Hb分别为(42.26±2.99)g/L和(127.53±10.11)g/L,高于对照组的(34.09±4.61)g/L和(112.81±15.87)g/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组CRP为(7.67±2.93)mg/L,低于对照组的(12.78±3.14)mg/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组骨骼肌质量指数、握力和步速分别为(6.35±0.92)kg/m2、(24.85±2.91)kg和(0.96±0.09)m/s,均高于对照组的(5.78±0.77)kg/m2、(22.88±2.58)kg和(0.87±0.08)m/s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组病人肺部感染、切口感染、吻合口瘘等并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论乳清蛋白和维生素D联合抗阻运动方案在改善老年食管癌合并肌肉减少症病人的营养状况、生活质量、骨骼肌功能和生化指标方面具有显著优势。

关键词: 乳清蛋白, 维生素D, 抗阻运动, 食管癌, 肌肉减少症

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical effect of whey protein and vitamin D combined with anti-resistance exercise in improving sarcopenia in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 76 patients with esophageal cancer and sarcopenia treated at Yancheng Third People's Hospital between June 2023 and August 2024 was conducted.The patients were divided into a control group (38 cases) and an observation group (38 cases) based on different nutritional support regimens.The control group received conventional nutritional support,while the observation group was subjected to a combined intervention of whey protein,vitamin D,and resistance exercise.The nutritional status of patients in the two groups was assessed using the patient Subjective Global Assessment Scale (PG-SGA),the quality of life of patients in the two groups was assessed using the esophageal cancer Specific Scale (QLQ-OES18),and the levels of serum albumen(ALB),hemoglobin(Hb) and C-reactive protein(CRP),skeletal muscle mass index,grip strength and walking speed were compared between the two groups.And complication rates in both groups.Results Three month after operation,the PG-SGA score of the observation group was 11.54±2.03,which was significantly lower than that of the control group (13.11±1.97)(P<0.05).The QLQ-OES18 scale showed that the scores of swallowing function in the observation group (67.43±4.89) were significantly higher than those in the control group(64.69±4.26)(P<0.05),while the scores of eating discomfort,pain and reflux (56.47±4.69,57.28±5.18 and 54.94±4.87) were significantly lower than those in the control group(59.51±4.75,60.44±5.05,57.29±5.03) (P<0.05).In addition,the plasma ALB and Hb of the observation group were (42.26±2.99)g/L and(127.53±10.11)g/L,respectively,which were significantly higher than those of the control group[(34.09±4.61)g/L and(112.81±15.87)g/L] (P<0.05),and the CRP was (7.67±2.93)mg/L,which was significantly lower than that of the control group[(12.78±3.14)mg/L] (P<0.05).The skeletal muscle mass index,grip strength and walking speed of observation group were(6.35±0.92)kg/m

Key words: whey protein, vitamin D, resistance movement, esophageal cancer, sarcopenia

[1] 侯英利 冯晓娜 李春晖 侯永超 殷星. 食管癌病人血清lncRNA CASC11、lncRNA THOR表达水平及其临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 969-973.
[2] 汪俊 吕瑕智 陶玉 胡传朋. 血清微小核糖核酸-335-5p、内皮细胞特异性分子-1对食管癌病人的早期诊断及预后评估价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 836-840.
[3] 邹裕海 刘雨 梁必雄. 术前呼吸道准备与术后引流量对食管癌胸腹腔镜根治术后肺部并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 841-845.
[4] 张智 张青青 温艳娜 屈少磊. 食管癌根治术后并发肺部感染病人病原菌分布及血清人β-防御素-3、FMS样酪氨酸激酶3配体水平变化[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(6): 602-606.
[5] 贠宇辉 姬翔 韩国梁 郭伟. 食管癌胸腔镜根治术中不同喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫对近期疗效、血清髓系细胞触发受体-1、肿瘤坏死因子受体相关蛋白-1水平及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 482-485.
[6] 杨三虎 李岩 黄立军 颜振科 刘旭 李万山 姬翔. 早中期食管癌全腔镜切除术后3年无复发生存的随机森林预测研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 486-492.
[7] 卢海 付琴 朱允和 张先政. 咪达唑仑调节CCL2-CCR2信号通路对食管癌细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 493-497.
[8] 张雪, 李利发, 侯松林, 周彤. 肌肉减少症在腹股沟疝中的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(4): 445-447.
[9] 王怡凤 华荣 何毅. 老年食管癌病人术后并发症Clavien-Dindo分级≥Ⅲ级的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 261-266.
[10] 袁浩 滕靖琰 张强. 免疫治疗在食管癌新辅助治疗中的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(2): 210-212.
[11] 唐海军 魏小丽. 术前C反应蛋白-白蛋白-淋巴细胞指数对食管癌病人手术治疗预后的临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(12): 1267-1270.
[12] 衣舜 柳爽爽 王耀鹏 王传孝 矫文捷. 血清长链非编码RNA Kinectin 1反义RNA 1和视网膜母细胞瘤结合蛋白4表达与食管癌病人术后复发转移的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(10): 1077-1081.
[13] 张臻, 柳林, 朱祎曜, 吴小波. 早期食管癌病人内镜下黏膜剥离术后Barrett食管发生的影响因素[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 89-91.
[14] 孙梦飞 祁玲 李勇. 食管癌外科治疗为主的治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 785-788.
[15] 孔维博 刘轶炜 郑浩 张仁泉. 影像组学和深度学习在食管外科治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 796-799.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[2] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[3] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[4] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[5] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[6] 胡小平;王志维;邓宏平;等. 改良全主动脉弓置换治疗老年Stanford A型主动脉夹层[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 777 .
[7] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[8] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[9] 金鑫;周鹏;赵文超;等. 肾脏混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[10] 陈凛;崔建新. 胃癌术后复发与再手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 813 .