临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 669-672.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.07.021

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科对腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合病人康复及应激的影响

  

  1. 401121 中国科学院大学重庆市人民医院肝胆外科
  • 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 郑明友,Email:2427468410@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科卫联合医学科研资助项目(2018QNXM031);重庆市人民医院医学科技创新基金资助项目(Y2017MSXM06)

The influence of fast tract surgery on postoperative recovery and stress reaction for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Chongqing People's Hospital,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chongqing 401121,China
  • Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-07-20

摘要: 目的 分析加速康复外科(ERAS)对腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合病人康复及应激反应的影响。
方法 回顾性分析2016年5月至2019年4月重庆市人民医院肝胆外科行腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合术60例病人临床资料。根据康复方式分为ERAS组(30例),对照组(30例),ERAS组采用ERAS理念进行围手术期管理,对照组则按照常规方法管理。对比两组间病人下床时间、肛门排气时间、进食时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症,术前和术后第1、3、5天外周血白细胞介素(IL)-6、C反应蛋白(CRP)及白细胞计数(WBC)等。
结果 两组均顺利完成手术。ERAS组术后下床时间、排气时间、进食时间提前,术后住院时间缩短,住院费用显著降低。术后并发症发生率(26.7%比50%)低于对照组,术后镇痛效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后第1、3、5天,ERAS组IL-6和CRP低于对照组,分别为(80.05±27.84)μg/L比(191.47±118.26)μg/L、(52.78±33.28)μg/L比(112.98±63.89)μg/L、(18.11±8.20)μg/L比(55.80±38.62)μg/L,以及(30.46±16.37)mg/L比(56.38±38.12)mg/L、(80.05±27.84)mg/L比(113.88±68.44)mg/L、(43.60±22.49)mg/L比(66.59±35.72)mg/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论 ERAS理念应用于腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合病人,能够减轻术后应激反应,减少术后并发症,加速病人康复。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 腹腔镜手术, 一期缝合, 应激反应

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)procedures on recovery and stress response in patients undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture(LBEPS).
Methods Retrospective analysis of 60 patients with the LBEPS in Chongqing People’s Hospital from May 2016 to April 2019.According to the rehabilitation method,it was divided into intervention group(n=30)and control group(n=30).The intervention group adopted the concept of ERAS for perioperative management,and the control group was managed according to the routine method.The time to get out of bed,anal exhaust time,eating time,length of stay,hospital costs,postoperative complications,and interleukin-6(IL-6),C-reactive protein(CRP),and white blood cell count(WBC)on day 1st,3rd,and 5th before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.
Results Both groups completed the operation successfully.There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups(P>0.05).In the intervention group,the time of getting out of bed,exhaust and eating were earlier,the time of hospitalization was shorter and the cost of hospitalization was lower.The incidence of postoperative complications(26.7% vs.50%)was lower than that of the control group,and the analgesic effect was better,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).On the first,third and fifth days after surgery,IL-6 and CRP in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group,respectively(80.05±27.84)μg/L vs.(191.47±118.26)μg/L,(52.78±33.28)μg/L vs.(112.98±63.89)μg/L,(18.11±8.20)μg/L vs.(55.80±38.62)μg/L,(30.46±16.37)mg/L vs.(56.38±38.12)mg/L,(80.05±27.84)mg/L vs.(113.88±68.44)mg/L,(43.60±22.49)mg/L vs.(66.59±〖LM〗35.72)mg/L,the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).
Conclusion The  concept of the ERAS to patients with the LBEPS can reduce postoperative stress response,reduce postoperative complications,and accelerate rehabilitation of patients.

Key words: fast tract surgery, laparoscopy operation, primary closure, stress reaction

[1] 李安 秦大磊. 左胸单切口与右胸腹双切口在胸中下段食管癌手术中的应用比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 693-695.
[2] 周腾, 江振辉, 陈振远 . 腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合在胆总管结石治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 560-562.
[3] 龙飞, 李亮, 林昌伟, 李小荣. 结直肠手术快速康复的关键节点和主要措施[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 416-419.
[4] 黄永亨, 吴国忠, 庞绍春等. 高龄右半结肠癌切除应用快速康复外科疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 444-446.
[5] 宋兴超, 路要武, 吴超等. 加速康复外科在全腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 456-459.
[6] 汪东文, 樊巍巍, 乔庆等. 加速康复外科对老年胃癌病人术后谵妄发生的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 480-482.
[7] 黄莹, 刘德云. 腹腔镜手术切除对巨大嗜铬细胞瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 168-170.
[8] 陈娟, 郭翔, 鄢子盛等. 加速康复外科对假性包膜外垂体腺瘤切除术病人的围手术期管理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 758-760.
[9] 杜京丽, 郭庆森, 郑茂煌, 刘益峰, 吴德柱. 微创胆总管切开取石不同手术方式的疗效对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 664-667.
[10] 马双阳, 戴兵, 刘驰等. 腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 592-594.
[11] 李欣龙, 顾立虎, 祝和攀, 潘军海, 陈玉萍. 加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 404-407.
[12] 赵蓉, 沈昊, 周家杰, 常洁, 陈诗幻. 加速康复外科结合穴位敷贴促进腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后胃肠道功能恢复的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 423-426.
[13] 巴雅尔, 李钢, 高洪强, 卢晖, 张荣. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 155-157.
[14] 吕晶, 胡艺川, 姚尚龙. 右美托咪定不同给药途径复合头皮神经阻滞对围术期血流动力学和应激反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1074-1076.
[15] 勾善淼, 吴河水. 胰头癌腹腔镜切除的现状及展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1091-1093.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王延磊, 戴勇. 腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术质控要点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 404 -406 .
[2] 邓祥兵, 张豪, 王自强. 盆内筋膜与盆内脏血管神经关系的研究进展及侧方淋巴结清扫术的技术改良[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 407 -411 .
[3] 韩方海, 钟广宇. 直肠癌全直肠系膜切除手术中保护盆腔自主神经的技术路径[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 412 -415 .
[4] 梁太平, 裴轶飞, 周建等. 主动脉夹层的治疗现状与未来[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 501 -503 .
[5] 李永康, 王南鹏, 杨能红. 左颈清术后合并双侧乳糜胸及肺炎一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 598 .
[6] 袁野 金润森 李鹤成. 机器人手术在肺癌外科的现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 601 -604 .
[7] 李宗元 陈晓烨 刘伦旭. 机器学习在肺癌外科的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 605 -607 .
[8] 滕啸 胡坚. 非小细胞肺癌新辅助免疫治疗前景[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 608 -610 .
[9] 张帆 谭锋维 薛奇 高树庚. 免疫检查点抑制剂在非小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗中的现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 611 -614 .
[10] 傅睿 钟文昭. 外科在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌多学科综合治疗中的地位[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 615 -617 .