临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 961-964.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.11.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

内镜与外科手术治疗符合内镜黏膜下剥离术扩大适应证的老年单发早期胃癌的疗效对比

  

  1. 新疆,石河子大学第三附属医院消化内科
  • 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20

Comparison of efficacy between endoscopic and surgical in treatment of elderly singleearly early gastric cancer patients with extended endoscopic submucosal dissection indications

  • Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 目的:对比内镜与外科手术治疗符合内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)扩大适应证的老年单发早期胃癌的临床疗效与安全性。方法:老年单发早期胃癌病人104例,根据治疗方法不同分为两组,内镜组72例,采用经内镜手术治疗,外科组32例,行外科手术治疗。两组病人均满足ESD扩大适应证。对比两组病人的手术时间、住院时间、术后病灶残留、复发、5年存活率及并发症等情况。结果:内镜组的手术时间、术后禁食时间、住院时间和住院费用与外科组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组的短期并发症总发生率接近(P>0.05),但内镜组的长期并发症总发生率显著低于外科组(P<0.05);内镜组与外科组的治愈性切除率、整块切除率、病灶残留率、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组病人均获得随访,内镜组5年完全生存率、无病生存率分别为100%(72/72)和95.83%(69/72),外科组分别为96.88%(31/32)和93.75%(30/32),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:符合ESD扩大适应证的老年单发早期胃癌病人,实施内镜手术与外科手术治疗的疗效接近,但前者手术耗时短、长期并发症少、术后恢复快。

关键词: 早期胃癌, 内镜黏膜下剥离术, 外科手术, 并发症, 病灶残留

Abstract: Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic and surgical treatment for elderly singleearly early gastric cancer with extended indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).Methods:72 patients with elderly singleearly early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic surgery and 32 patients with early gastric cancer treated by surgery at the same time were respectively enrolled in the endoscopic group and the surgical group.Both groups met the expanded indications of ESD.The operation time,hospitalization time,residual lesions,recurrence,5year survival rate and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time,fasting time and hospitalization time of the endoscopic group were significantly shorter than those of the surgical group,and the hospitalization expenses were significantly lower than those of the surgical group(P<0.05);the total incidence of shortterm complications in the two groups was close(P>0.05),but the total incidence of longterm complications in the endoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the surgical group(P<0.05);the curative resection rate and the total resection rate of the endoscopic group were significantly lower than those in There was no significant difference in residual rate and recurrence rate(P>0.05).The 5year complete survival rate and diseasefree survival rate were 100% (72/72)and 95.83%(69/72) in endoscopy group,respectively,while in surgery group were 96.88%(31/32) and 93.75%(30/32),respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Endoscopic surgery forelderly singleearly early gastric cancer,which meets the expanded indications of ESD,has the advantages of short operation time,less longterm complications and quick recovery.

Key words: early gastric cancer, endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgery, complications, residual lesions

[1] 汪雅琳. 三尖瓣感染性心内膜炎的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 677-679.
[2] 周超, 李文涛, 范利民等. 胸腔镜肺叶切除术后肺叶扭转的外科诊治分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 555-557.
[3] 吴分浪, 关则俭, 陈盛勇等. 脑室腹腔分流术后颅内感染20例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 615-617.
[4] 刘远梅. 经肛门巨结肠根治术的远期疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 462-464.
[5] 郑兵, 王伟, 任锐, 朱涛, 芦灵军, 陆昌友. 胆总管结石病人腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合内镜括约肌切开术术后并发症及其影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 485-488.
[6] 陶凯雄. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症的防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 363-366.
[7] 蔡开琳. 胃癌诊疗相关的临床病理学进展对外科的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 370-372.
[8] 刘飞, 冯呈, 陈廖斌. 早期内侧髌股韧带重建治疗急性创伤性髌骨脱位疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 295-298.
[9] 罗加龙. SuperPath微创入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的近远期效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 300-303.
[10] 朱加猛. 乳腺癌改良根治术中肋间臂神经保留的可行性与安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 214-217.
[11] 陈云, 杨绍军, 凌锋, 罗娜, 高帆, 李双江. 膈膨升并胃扭转、脾破裂诊治一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 234-235.
[12] 李腾芳. 纵切横缝内括约肌切断术治疗老年肛裂病人的疗效分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 253-255.
[13] 果宏峰, 赵文锋, 李宁忱. 前列腺穿刺感染性并发症的防控[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 100-101.
[14] 胡均贤, 徐春林, 吴雅兰. 环池形态改变与颅脑损伤开颅术后常见并发症的关系研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 135-137.
[15] 徐翠, 齐向秀. 加温加湿二氧化碳气腹对普外科腹腔镜手术病人影响的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 953-956.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 目录[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 829 .
[2] 钱永尚, 余铃, 杨东风, 肖松, 李建东, 程晓锋. 微创经皮钢板接骨术与传统开放手术用于治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 904 -906 .
[3] 孙展, 韩斐, 罗凡砚, 陈育斌. 杂交手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 925 -927 .
[4] 孟庆友, 赵彬. 复杂腹主动脉夹层动脉瘤腔内治疗的现状及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 928 -930 .
[5] 卢晨, 杨鹏, 黄尧, 刘宇, 胡佳. 多层血流调节器治疗主动脉夹层术后远端残余夹层的临床经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 931 -934 .
[6] 丁帅, 马先桃, 程才. 杂交技术在Stanford A型主动脉夹层的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 935 -937 .
[7] 方坤, 罗明尧, 赵嘉伟, 薛云飞, 舒畅. 3D导航技术在主动脉腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 938 -942 .
[8] 顾建军, 刘杰, 薛正龙, 陈立华 . 一站式杂交手术治疗 Stanford A型主动脉夹层的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 943 -945 .
[9] 吴建涛, 王家富, 池一凡等. 心血管外科术后胸部切口愈合不良高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 946 -949 .
[10] 吴满仓, 李志强, 吴东妮等. 乳腺非特殊类型浸润性癌1721例检出趋势及分布特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 950 -952 .