临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 90-94.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241987

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胶质纤维酸性蛋白和胰岛素样生长因子-1对脊柱骨折伴创伤性脊髓损伤的临床意义

黄杰,王江峰,刘瑾,孙金琳   

  1. 741000 甘肃天水,天水市第一人民医院骨科
  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 孙金琳,Email:1820055300@qq.com

Glial fibrillary acidic protein and insulin-like growth factor 1:clinical significance in spinalfracture with traumatic spinal cord injury

HUANG Jie,WANG Jiangfeng,LIU Jin,SUN Jinlin   

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Tianshui First People's Hospital,Gansu,Tianshui 741000,〖WTBZ〗China
  • Online:2026-03-05 Published:2026-01-20

摘要: 目的探讨脊柱骨折伴创伤性脊髓损伤病人血清胶质纤维酸性蛋白(glial fibrillary acidic protein,GFAP)、胰岛素样生长因子-1(Insulin-like growth factor-1,IGF-1)水平与神经功能及预后关系。方法前瞻性选取2021年10月~2023年10月92例脊柱骨折伴创伤性脊髓损伤病人为观察组,根据神经功能分为轻、中、重度组,预后情况分为预后良好和不良组,另选择仅脊柱骨折病人92例为对照组。酶联免疫吸附法测定GFAP和IGF-1水平;逐步向前的多因素Logistic回归分析预后影响因素;受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析GFAP、IGF-1对病人预后预测效能。结果对照组GFAP为(16.86±3.25) μg/L,IGF-1为(146.24±31.47) μg/L),观察组分别为(32.57±7.21) μg/L和(97.81±22.43) μg/L),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与神经功能损伤程度(轻度组GFAP=22.15±4.75 μg/L,IGF-1=116.27±22.31 μg/L;中度组GFAP=36.24±9.64 μg/L,IGF-1=92.14±17.68 μg/L;重度组GFAP=55.68±13.54 μg/L,IGF-1=51.78±14.64 μg/L)相关(P<0.05)。预后良好组GFAP为(26.48±5.86 )μg/L,IGF-1为(112.23±24.15 )μg/L,预后不良组分别为(42.05±8.79 )μg/L、(75.39±15.62) μg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果表明,Frankel分级、GFAP、IGF-1水平是病人预后不良影响因素(Frankel分级OR=2.460,GFAP OR=1.926,IGF-1 OR=0.548,P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,血清GFAP、IGF-1联合预测病人预后不良曲线下面积为0.983,显著大于单独预测(Z=2.087、2.398,P=0.037、0.016)。结论脊柱骨折伴创伤性脊髓损伤病人血清GFAP上升,IGF-1下降,与神经功能损伤相关,其中GFAP是病人预后危险因素,IGF-1是保护因素。

关键词: 脊柱骨折, 脊髓损伤, 胶质纤维酸性蛋白, 胰岛素样生长因子-1, 临床意义

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between serum levels of glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and neurological function and prognosis in patients with spinal fractures and traumatic spinal cord injury.Methods A total of 92 patients with spinal fractures and traumatic spinal cord injuries from October 2021 to October 2023 were prospectively selected as the observation group and divided into mild,moderate,and severe subgroups based on neurological function.They were also categorized into good and poor prognosis groups.Another 92 patients with only spinal fractures were selected as the control group.Serum GFAP and IGF-1 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).Forward stepwise multivariable Logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors,and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive performance of GFAP and IGF-1 for patient prognosis.Result The GFAP of the control group was (16.86±3.25)μg/L, and the IGF-1 was (146.24±31.47)μg/L, while those of the observation group were (32.57±7.21)μg/L and (97.81±22.43)μg/L, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P< 0.05 ).These levels were correlated with the severity of neurological injury (mild group:GFAP=22.15±4.75 μg/L,IGF-1=116.27±22.31 μg/L;moderate group:GFAP=36.24±9.64 μg/L,IGF-1=92.14±17.68 μg/L;severe group:GFAP=55.68±13.54 μg/L,IGF-1=51.78±14.64 μg/L,P<0.05).Compared with the good prognosis group (GFAP=26.48±5.86 μg/L,IGF-1=112.23±24.15 μg/L),patients in the poor prognosis group (GFAP=42.05±8.79 μg/L,IGF-1=75.39±15.62 μg/L) exhibited higher GFAP levels and lower IGF-1 levels (P<0.05).Multivariable Logistic regression analysis indicated that Frankel grade,GFAP,and IGF-1 levels were independent risk factors for poor prognosis (Frankel grade OR=2.460,GFAP OR=1.926,IGF-1 OR=0.548,P<0.05).ROC showed that the area under the curve of serum GFAP and IGF-1 combined to predict poor prognosis of patients was 0.983,which was significantly greater than that of single prediction (Z=2.087,2.398,P=0.037,0.016).Conclusion In patients with spinal fractures and traumatic spinal cord injuries,serum GFAP levels are elevated and IGF-1 levels are reduced,which are associated with neurological injury severity.GFAP is a risk factor for poor prognosis,while IGF-1 is a protective factor.

Key words: spinal fracture, spinal cord injury, glial fibrillary acidic protein, insulin like growth factor 1, clinical significance

[1] 陈漳鑫, 余铃, 郭卫春. 2024国际脊柱研究学会/Praxis脊髓研究所急性脊髓损伤管理临床实践指南解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 52-56.
[2] 黄晓媚 郭明 骆俊龙 包传恩 胡蒙. 血清血管内皮生长因子、胰岛素样生长因子-1水平与胸腔镜食管癌根治术后食管胃吻合口漏的相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 276-280.
[3] 薛诚 马骏. 未破裂颅内动脉瘤病人血清miR-448-3p、KLF5表达水平及临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 565-568.
[4] 马明, 杜建伟, 沈书明. 行微创术治疗的老年骨质疏松性脊柱骨折病人术后骨折再发的危险因素探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1036-1038.
[5] 杨燕 刘显明 韩涛. 脑脊液循环重建联合去骨瓣减压术对颅脑损伤病人颅内压及缺氧诱导因子-1α、胶质纤维酸性蛋白和纤溶酶原激活物的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(10): 926-929.
[6] 韦学昌, 董胜利, 刘帅, 张豪伟. 前后路联合手术治疗颈椎骨折脱位并脊髓损伤的临床疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1083-1085.
[7] 潘峰 陶海鹰 任岳等. Wiltse经椎旁肌间隙入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 378-380.
[8] 赵晓光 孙甫. 41例无骨折脱位型脊髓损伤治疗分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 402-403.
[9] 华胸怀 张瑞祥 孙海波 孟凡宇 于永魁 马海波 李印. 食管胸段鳞右喉返神经旁淋巴结转移的相关性因素分析及其临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(4): 269-269.
[10] 赵立. 前列腺癌的Gleason评分及临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 87-87.
[11] 闫加鹏 陈建梅 徐皓. 儿童无放射学影像异常脊髓损伤11例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 135-135.
[12] 涂强 丁焕文 曹露等. 胸腰椎爆裂性骨折前路手术的临床研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(11): 793-795.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张业强;晏大学;高小见 . 急诊肋骨内固定手术对严重连枷胸患者恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 794 .
[2] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[3] 刘江豪;李刚;张克强;等. 机器人辅助甲状腺切除术和腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗cN0期分化型甲状腺癌的有效性、安全性Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 852 .
[4] 周振宇;汪路明;王一青;等. 肺部多发结节468例诊疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[5] 李义亮;苏福增;克力木;等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 847 .
[6] 李颢;叶达夫;李京涛;等. 双镜联合二期治疗尿道球部断裂一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 878 .
[7] 刘智化;陈坚;刘绪舜. 超声引导下冷循环微波消融治疗甲状腺微小癌的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 934 .
[8] 卓德强;徐志宏;汪明月;等. 不同介入治疗模式对晚期肝癌患者的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 937 .
[9] 吴强;王欣;张慧俊. 七例手部肿瘤误诊分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 922 .
[10] 宋辉琼 邹玉凤 张宗泽等. 肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔内热灌注化疗术后谵妄发生的危险因素分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 308 - 308 .