临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 982-985.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.10.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

瑞马唑仑对腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人血清丙二醛、超氧化物歧化酶和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶水平的影响

  

  1. 352100 福建,宁德师范学院附属宁德市医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-12 接受日期:2023-01-12 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:徐曈,Email:779751919@qq.com

Effect of remazolam on serum malondialdehyde,superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,NingDe Municipal Hospital of Ningde Normal University,Fujian,Ningde 352100,China
  • Received:2023-01-12 Accepted:2023-01-12 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-20

摘要: 目的   分析瑞马唑仑对腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人血清丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)水平的影响。  方法   2021年12月~2022年11月本院收治的胆囊炎、胆石症行腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人110例,按照随机数表法分成两组,丙泊酚组55例,应用丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导与麻醉维持,瑞马唑仑组55例,应用瑞马唑仑进行麻醉诱导与麻醉维持,其余麻醉方法相同。比较两组的生命体征(平均动脉压、心率)、麻醉苏醒指标(睁眼时间、定向力恢复时间、拔管时间)、氧化应激指标(MDA、SOD、GSH-Px)、认知功能(MMSE评分)以及不良反应(呼吸抑制、躁动、头晕头痛、低血压、嗜睡)。  结果   瑞马唑仑组插管即刻、气腹即刻、拔管即刻的平均动脉压、心率均高于丙泊酚组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);瑞马唑仑组睁眼时间、定向力恢复时间、拔管时间分别为(10.37±2.15)分钟、(10.83±2.41)分钟和(11.06±2.19)分钟,丙泊酚组分别为(12.44±2.78)分钟、(13.16±2.84)分钟和(14.78±2.55)分钟,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);瑞马唑仑组术后1天的MDA水平[(19.73±2.32)mmol/L]低于丙泊酚组[(27.82±2.95)mmol/L],SOD、GSH-Px水平[(310.85±27.61)U/ml、(939.63±105.14)U]高于丙泊酚组[(275.33±24.97)U/ml、(844.73±96.30)U];瑞马唑仑组术后1天的MMSE评分[(26.89±1.00)分]高于丙泊酚组[(25.33±0.92) 分],两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);瑞马唑仑组不良反应发生率为7.27%,低于丙泊酚组的21.82%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。  结论   瑞马唑仑在腹腔镜胆囊切除术麻醉中的应用效果好,可稳定病人生命体征,提高麻醉苏醒质量,减轻氧化应激反应与认知功能损伤,不良反应少。


关键词: 瑞马唑仑, 腹腔镜胆囊切除术, 丙二醛, 超氧化物歧化酶, 谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶

Abstract: Objective   To analyze the effect of remazolam on serum malondialdehyde (MDA),superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH Px) levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Methods   From december 2021 to november 2022,110 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our general surgery department were divided into propofol group and ramazolam group according to the random number table method.55 patients in the propofol group were anesthetized with propofol for induction and maintenance,55 patients in the ramazolam group were anesthetized with ramazolam for induction and maintenance.The vital signs(mean arterial pressure, heart rate),indexes of anesthesia awakening(eye opening time, orientation recovery time, extubation time),indexes of oxidative stress(MDA, SOD, GSH Px),cognitive function(MMSE score) and adverse reactions(respiratory depression, restlessness, dizziness, headache, hypotension, drowsiness) of the two groups were compared.  Results   The mean arterial pressure and heart rate at the time of intubation,pneumoperitoneum and extubation in the ramazolam group were higher than those in the propofol group (P<0.05).The time of eye opening,recovery of orientation and extubation in remiazolam group [(10.37±2.15)min,(10.83±2.41)min,(11.06±2.19)min] were shorter than those in propofol group [(12.44±2.78)min,(13.16±2.84)min,(14.78±2.55)min] (P<0.05).The level of MDA at 1 day after surgery in remiazolam group [(19.73±2.32)mmol/L] were lower than those in propofol group [(27.82±2.95)mmol/L],and the level of SOD and GSH Px in remiazolam group [(310.85±27.61)U/ml,(939.63±105.14)U] were higher than those in propofol group [(275.33±24.97)U/ml,(844.73±96.30)U](all P<0.05).MMSE score of remiazolam group (26.89±1.00) was higher than that of propofol group (25.33±0.92) on the first day after operation (P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in remidazolam group was 7.27%,lower than 21.82% in propofol group(P<0.05).  Conclusion   Remazolam is effective in anesthesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.It can stabilize the vital signs of patients,improve the quality of recovery from anesthesia,reduce oxidative stress reaction and cognitive function damage,and has few adverse reactions.

Key words: remazolam, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, malondialdehyde, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase

[1] 喻淋淋 李春桃 陆昌友 蒲邦明 郭勇 高源. 以“A-C-P”线为解剖标识在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 581-583.
[2] 朱毓豪 江斌 胡旭昊 霍岩松. 肝左外叶异位胆囊行腹腔镜切除一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 899-899.
[3] 谢柯祺 何玲 代艳 陈小虎 代宝珠 李军. 瑞马唑仑对甲状腺相关眼病的眶壁减压术病人术后谵妄、应激反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 548-551.
[4] 许曦鸣 宋春光 王磊. 监测直肠癌病人术中脑氧饱和度及血清血红素加氧酶 -1、超氧化物歧化酶含量对术后认知功能的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 556-559.
[5] 胡勇军 殷强 晏华军 沈雄山. 复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术127例临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 468-470.
[6] 佘明杰 徐永建 张佩君 付强 卢伟 刘小虎. 早期和延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石性胰腺炎疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 186-188.
[7] 尹露, 王恒, 王健等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术中发生二氧化碳气栓的麻醉处理一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 720-721.
[8] 张吉祥, 张娟, 何希平等. 一期腹腔镜胆囊切除联合腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的清石效果观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 562-564.
[9] 蒋康怡 高峰畏 雷泽华 谢青云 赵欣 龚杰. 循A-B-D路径的腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急性化脓或坏疽性胆囊炎病人中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1038-1040.
[10] 张勇 毛正发. 不同时间窗下腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 728-731.
[11] 刘召洪 王家兴 林龙英 李捷 杨志. 医源性胆道损伤22例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 353-356.
[12] 郑兵, 王伟, 任锐, 朱涛, 芦灵军, 陆昌友. 胆总管结石病人腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合内镜括约肌切开术术后并发症及其影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 485-488.
[13] 王鹏, 席树强. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后并发肠粘连的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1024-1027.
[14] 吴艳烈;王家欢;余胜峰. 急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术47例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(8): 593-594.
[15] 姚军波 沈小青 于聪慧. 腹腔镜下治疗胆囊管结石46例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(4): 299-299.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蔡秀军 陈鸣宇 曹佳胜 张斌. 美国国立综合癌症网络临床实践指南:肝胆癌(2022.V2)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 11 -13 .
[2] 屠霖 赵恩昊. 美国国立综合癌症网络食管与食管胃结合部癌临床实践指南(2022.V1-V4)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 18 -20 .
[3] 吴智明 蒋磊 叶晟劼 赵文宇. 单孔胸腔镜在磨玻璃结节为主的早期肺癌手术切除中的应用效果研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 53 -56 .
[4] 费建平 刘宏伟. 甲状腺乳头状癌喉返神经深层面淋巴结转移的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 57 -59 .
[5] 李江利 张士虎 王昆 等. 甲状腺嗜酸细胞癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 72 -73 .
[6] 郭佳 朱传想 何伟. 经括约肌间瘘管结扎术联合直肠推移瓣术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的可行性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 74 -76 .
[7] 张伟 韦昌辉 王军. 富血小板血浆联合同种异体骨植骨在良性骨肿瘤致病理性骨折中的临床疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 84 -88 .
[8] 华珊珊 谢方瑜 周萌 栾晓娜. COX健康行为互动模式在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折微创术后恐动症患者管理中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 93 -96 .
[9] 彭靖. 男性不育症诊断和治疗的热点问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 102 -105 .
[10] 自翔宇 曹渊卿 刘红羽. 腹腔镜下腹膜外腰疝修补术及开放式腰疝修补术三例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 131 -132 .