临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 959-961.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.10.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

自动痔套扎联合硬化剂注射治疗Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度内痔的临床研究

  

  1. 116011 大连,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六七医院胃肠外科  
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-15 接受日期:2023-01-15 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:李冰,Email:libing313w1@163.com

Clinical study of automatic hemorrhoidal banding combined with sclerotherapy for the treatment of second- and third-degree internal hemorrhoids

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,967 Hospital of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force,Liaoning Province,Dalian 116011,China
  • Received:2023-01-15 Accepted:2023-01-15 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-20

摘要: 目的   研究自动痔套扎(RPH)联合硬化剂注射治疗Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度内痔的临床效果。  方法   2019年3月~2022年9月我院收治Ⅱ度和Ⅲ度内痔156例,按照随机数字表法分为3组,即痔结扎组、RPH组、RPH+硬化剂注射组,每组各52例,3组分别行痔结扎术、RPH术、RPH+硬化剂注射术。比较3组的手术时间、住院时间、痔块脱落时间、术后出血、术后肛门坠胀、术后肛缘水肿、术后肛门狭窄等指标。  结果   3组病人有效率均达100%。痔结扎组手术时间、住院时间、痔块脱落时间方面分别为(34.13±5.80)分钟、(8.65±0.96)天和(5.94±0.46)天,RPH组分别为(22.81±1.95)分钟、(6.58±0.75)天、(8.02±0.43)天,RPH+硬化剂注射组分别为(23.73±2.02)分钟、(6.46±0.75)天、(8.00 ±0.56)天, RPH及RPH+硬化剂注射组与痔结扎组比较,痔块脱落时间延长,手术时间、住院时间缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。痔结扎组术后出血为(177.40±30.45)ml,RPH组为(105.44±15.92)ml,RPH+硬化剂注射组为(59.46±14.99)ml,RPH组和RPH+硬化剂注射组病人出血量显著少于痔结扎组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),RPH+硬化剂注射组病人出血量少于RPH组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。痔结扎组术后肛门坠胀15例,RPH组为10例,RPH+硬化剂注射组为7例,RPH组和RPH+硬化剂注射组病人肛门坠胀少于痔结扎组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。痔结扎组术后肛缘水肿、肛门狭窄3例、0例,RPH组为2例、0例,RPH+硬化剂注射组为3例、0例,3组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。  结论   RPH联合硬化剂注射术能降低病人术后出血、住院时间、术后肛门坠胀,术后效果满意。

关键词: 自动痔套扎, 内痔, 硬化剂, 愈后

Abstract: Objective   To study the clinical effects of automatic hemorrhoidal banding (RPH) combined with sclerosing agent injection in the treatment of second- and third-degree internal hemorrhoids.  Methods   A total of 156 cases of second-degree and third-degree internal hemorrhoids were randomly divided into three groups,namely hemorrhoidal ligation group,RPH group,and (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group,with 52 cases in each group,and the three groups underwent hemorrhoidal ligation,RPH surgery,and (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) respectively.The surgical effect was evaluated by the three groups such as operation time,hospital stay,hemorrhoidal lump shedding time,postoperative bleeding,postoperative swelling,postoperative margin edema,and postoperative stenosis.  Results   After treatment,the effective rate of all three groups reached 100%.In terms of operation time,hospital stay and hemorrhoidal lump shedding time,the hemorrhoidal ligation group was (34.13±5.80)min,(8.65±0.96)d,(5.94±0.46)d,the RPH group was (22.81±1.95)min,(6.58±0.75)d,(8.02±0.43)d,the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was (23.73±2.02)min,(6.46±0.75)d,(8.00±0.56)d,RPH and (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group compared with hemorrhoidal ligation group,hemorrhoidal mass shedding time,surgery time and hospital stay shortened,and all were statistically significant (P<0.05),and the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group had less hospital stay than RPH group (P<0.05). In terms of postoperative bleeding,the hemorrhoidal ligation group was (177.40±30.45)ml,the RPH group was (105.44±15.92)ml,the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was (59.46±14.99)ml,the amount of blood loss in the RPH group and the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was less than that in the hemorrhoidal ligation group (P<0.05),and the blood loss in the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was significantly less than that in the RPH group (P<0.05). In terms of postoperative swelling,the hemorrhoidal ligation group was 15 cases,the RPH group was 10 cases,the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was 7 cases,the swelling in the RPH group and the (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was significantly less than that in the hemorrhoidal ligation group (P<0.05)。 In terms of postoperative edema and stenosis,the hemorrhoidal ligation group was 3 cases and 0 case,RPH group was 2 cases and 0 case,and (RPH + sclerotherapy injection) group was 3 cases and 0 case,and there was no significant difference between the three surgical methods (P>0.05).  Conclusion   RPH combined with sclerosing injection can significantly reduce the postoperative bleeding,hospital stay,and postoperative swelling,and the postoperative effect is satisfactory,which provides a reliable basis for the clinical treatment of Ⅱ and Ⅲ.degree internal hemorrhoids.

Key words: automatic hemorrhoidal ligation, internal hemorrhoids, hardeners, prognosis

[1] 袁赵 郑昂. 腹腔镜下脾切除术联合经内镜下套扎序贯硬化剂治疗对门静脉高压症病人的疗效及对其血流动力学及预后的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 691-693.
[2] 黄毅 李梦帆 黄荣. 大隐静脉高位结扎联合腔内激光闭合术和泡沫硬化剂注射治疗下肢静脉曲张的对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 814-817.
[3] 王春龙 赵凡 广东等 . 重建钛钢板内固定治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 148-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[2] 范强金;郑鹏超;李振军. 原发性肺软骨肉瘤病一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[3] 叶章群;刘浩然. 泌尿系结石的诊断治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(2): 85 .
[4] 刘胜新 吴兰艳 徐军辉 李震. 精细膜解剖技术在甲状腺手术中的应用体会(附211例报告)[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 839 -841 .
[5] 施家奇 李皓桓 彭飞 李建平 周思齐 蔡伟松 张宇标. 儿童和青少年的膝关节软骨修复[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 886 -890 .
[6] 赵灏, 陈世宏, 黄旭平. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗不稳定性老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 962 -964 .
[7] 胡月龙, 杨国瑛. 早期颅骨缺损修补术对病人神经功能修复的改善作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 48 -50 .
[8] 朱铁源, 范国华, 王土生, 黄杰. 颈部切口联合胸腔镜技术在颈纵隔良性肿瘤切除中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 149 -151 .
[9] 杨亚芳, 段克举, 刘真真, 崔树德. 乳腺数字化摄影中微钙化的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 223 -226 .
[10] 张志波. 影响胆道闭锁预后的原因及其争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 465 -468 .