临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1176-1178.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同消肿方式在全膝关节置换术后肿胀消退的效果比较分析

  

  1. 430071 武汉大学中南医院关节与运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-09 接受日期:2022-07-09 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈珺,Email:tinger8023@126.com

Comparative study of different methods in reducing edema after total knee arthroplasty

  1. Department of Joint and Sports Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China
  • Received:2022-07-09 Accepted:2022-07-09 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-20

摘要: 目的 比较多层加压疗法与使用生物冰袋冷敷法在全膝关节置换术后减轻水肿的有效性。方法  2020年1月~2022年1月行全膝关节置换手术病人100例。随机分为两组,每组各50例,观察组使用多层加压疗法,对照组使用生物冰袋冷敷法。评估术后1天、2天、3天和7天的肿胀程度,记录肿胀消退时间,评估术后1天和3天的疼痛和舒适度。结果 对照组术后1天、3天、5天和7天下肢肿胀处周径分别为(43.51±1.88)cm、(41.97±1.74)cm、(40.60±1.82)cm和(37.93±1.49)cm,观察组下肢肿胀处周径分别为(42.78±1.29)cm、(40.36±1.62)cm、(38.25±1.51)cm和(37.52±1.18)cm,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1天、2天和3天肿胀程度评分明显降低,肿胀消退时间显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1天和3天的疼痛评分和舒适度评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 多层加压疗法比冰袋冷敷对减轻全膝关节置换术后水肿效果更显著。

关键词: 全膝关节置换术, 多层加压疗法, 生物冰袋冷敷法, 消肿

Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness of multi-layer compression therapy and biological ice pack in alleviating edema after total knee arthroplasty.Methods 100 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty in our department from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected.They were randomly divided into two groups,50 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with multi-layer compression therapy,while the control group was treated with biological ice pack.The degree of swelling at 1d,2d,3d and 7d after surgery was evaluated,the time of swelling subtraction was recorded,and the pain and comfort at 1d and 3d after surgery were evaluated.Results On postoperative day 1,3,5 and 7,the circumference of lower limb swelling in the control group was (43.51±1.88)cm、(41.97±1.74)cm、(40.60±1.82)cm and (37.93±1.49)cm,respectively.The circumference of lower limb swelling in the observation group was (42.78±1.29)cm,(40.36±1.62)cm,(38.25±1.51)cm and (37.52±1.18)cm,respectively,which were significantly lower than those in the control group P<0.05).Besides,the swelling degree scores were significantly reduced at 1d,2d and 3d (P<0.05)and the swelling regression time was reduced compared to the control group (P<0.05),while the pain scores and comfort scores of observation group were not significantly different at 1d and 3d after operation (P>0.05).Conclusion Multi-layer compression therapy was more effective than ice pack cold compress in alleviating edema after total knee arthroplasty.

Key words: total knee arthroplasty, multi-layer compression therapy, biological ice pack, alleviating edema

[1] 麦瑶 李皓桓 胡金凤. 白噪音对全膝关节置换术病人心理状态和睡眠质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 589-591.
[2] 胡峰 李菊 王伟. 坐骨神经联合股神经阻滞下全膝关节置换术病人不同浓度罗哌卡因应用效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 893-896.
[3] 谭杨, 刘翰昆, 陈廖斌. 伴有关节外畸形的全膝关节置换术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 279-282.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[2] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[3] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[4] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[5] 余兰;聂秀. 脾脏硬化性血管瘤样结节性转化二例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 808 .
[6] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[7] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .
[8] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[9] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[10] 吴川清;刘炜圳;帅晓明;等. 超声内镜在胃癌术前诊断中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 828 .