临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 666-669.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.07.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种体位对创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗效果的影响分析

  

  1. 443000 湖北省宜昌市,三峡大学第一临床医学院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-24 接受日期:2021-12-24 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 周纳新,Email:617742678@qq.com

Therapeutic effect of three surgical positions on traumatic intertrochanteric fracture of femur

  1. Department of Orthopaedics,the First College of Clinical Medical Science,China Three Gorges University,hubei,Yichang 443000, China
  • Received:2021-12-24 Accepted:2021-12-24 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-07-20

摘要: 目的 评价三种手术体位对创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗效果的影响。 方法 2017年2月~2020年6月我院收治的创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折病人98例。根据手术体位不同分为截石位组(33例)、仰卧位组(33例)和侧卧位组(32例),三组均采用亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗,比较三组手术相关指标、髋关节功能优良率、疼痛情况、焦虑状态及并发症。 结果 三组术中出血量和骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);截石位组体位摆放时间、手术时间及透视时间均短于仰卧位组和侧卧位组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月随访时,侧卧位组优良率(90.63%)高于截石位组(84.85%)和仰卧位组(72.73%),但三组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与同组术前比较,三组术后3天和术后6个月视觉模拟评分(VAS)均获得显著改善(P<0.05)。三组间术前、术后VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在30分钟阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑和信息评分(APAIS评分)比较中,三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且仰卧位组和侧卧位组高于截石位组(P<0.05)。三组近期并发症分别为6.06%、9.09%及6.06%,远期并发症分别为3.03%、6.06%、3.13%,三组近期和远期并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 截石位、仰卧位、侧卧位3种体位均可用于创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折手术,但截石位有助于减轻反复透视对对医患伤害及病人焦虑心理,缩短手术时间。

关键词: 截石位, 仰卧位, 侧卧位, 股骨粗隆间骨折, 髋关节功能, 并发症

Abstract: Objective  To explore the efficacy of three surgical postures in the treatment of traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 98 patients with traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated in our hospital from February 2017 to June 2020 were selected.According to different surgical positions,they were divided into lithotomy position group(33 cases),supine position group(33 cases) and lateral position group(32 cases).The three groups were treated with Asian proximal femoral anti rotation intramedullary nail.The operation related indexes,excellent and good rate of hip function,pain,anxiety and complications were compared. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding and fracture healing time among the three groups(P>0.05).The placement time,operation time and fluoroscopy time of lithotomy position group were shorter than those of Supine position group and lateral lying position group(P<0.05).During the follow-up at 6 months after operation,the excellent and good rate in the lateral position group(90.63%) was higher than that in the lithotomy group(84.85%) and supine group(72.73%),but there was no significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).Compared with the same group before operation, the VAS scores of the three groups were significantly improved at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores before and after operation among the three groups (P>0.05).However,  the score of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS score) of the three groups had statistical significance in 30 minutes (P<0.05), and the supine position group and lateral position group were higher than the lithotomy position group (P<0.05).The short-term complications in the three groups were 6.06%,9.09% and 6.06%,respectively,and the long-term complications were 3.03%,6.06% and 3.13%,respectively.There was no significant difference in the short-term and long-term complications among the three groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Lithotomy position,Supine position and lateral decubitus position are effective in the treatment of traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fracture,with better recovery of hip function,less pain and fewer complications.However,the lithotomy position is helpful to reduce the injury to doctors and patients and patients' anxiety caused by repeated fluoroscopy,so as to shorten the operation time.

Key words: ithotomy position, supine position, lateral position, intertrochanteric fracture of femur, hip function, complication

[1] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[2] 马翔宇 王文革 吴建临 刘琦. 双动全髋关节假体全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 662-665.
[3] 刘翠苹 杨军 张伟同 冯再勇 葛芙蓉 李帅 杨德华 李康 曹国庆 汤绍涛. 腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗小儿消化道磁性异物的对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 483-485.
[4] 陈永杰 刘伟 陶鹏飞 冯晶 夏平. 颈椎术后早期硬膜外血肿并发食管漏两次修补一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(3): 269-271.
[5] 祁莹 谷现恩. 体外冲击波碎石术的并发症及其预防[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 112-114.
[6] 陈赓 佘丽 王健. 钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生合并尿潴留的有效性和安全性临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 126-129.
[7] 陈建新 林铭 金文海. 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级及影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 171-174.
[8] 官艳 何林钰 罗茵. 肝内胆管结石病人肝切除术后感染性并发症风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 182-185.
[9] 芦斌 梁立卓. 人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的手术学指标及骨密度、髋关节功能变化观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 193-195.
[10] 白洁 陶凯雄. 肥胖病人胃旁路术后并发症的防治研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 818-820.
[11] 江竟成 张超 王瀚 邓青山 吴蛟 罗鹏 邱俊 周世军 陶裕川 徐小平 屈小琴 向玉 易勇. 自体颅骨修补术术前颅骨处理方式对修复效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 821-823.
[12] 吴豪 余挺 李麟 殷国江 谈世刚 夏中元. 超声引导法桡动脉置管对血管损伤并发症发生率及恢复情况的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 889-891.
[13] 刘继辉, 孙明, 余兵. 纵隔负压引流管在经右胸途径食管癌手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 714-716.
[14] 孙启刚, 符策雄, 郑进方. 绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[15] 黄小兵. 胰腺微创手术获益人群探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 610-612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[3] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[4] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[5] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[6] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[7] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[8] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[9] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[10] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .