临床外科杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 967-970.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.10.020

• • 上一篇    下一篇

股骨头坏死保髋关节术中同种异体骨移植与人工椎板置入临床应用差异

  

  1. 123000 辽宁省阜新市中医医院骨一科
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-20

Difference of clinical application between allogeneic bone transplantation and artificial lamina implantation in hip preserving surgery for femoral head necrosis 

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Fuxin Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Liaoning,Fuxin 123000,China
  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-20

摘要: 目的 分析髓芯减压术联合同种异体骨移植或人工椎板置入在股骨头坏死保髋关节的临床疗效差异。
方法 2018年1月~2019年12月间收治的股骨头坏死病人80例,按治疗方法分为A组和B组,每组各40例。A组采用髓芯减压术联合同种异体骨移植术治疗,B组采用髓芯减压术联合人工椎板置入治疗;治疗前后采用HHS和VAS评分系统进行评估,并对治疗的成功率进行评估;治疗前及随访时行X光扫描检查,参照ARCO分期对影像学改变进行评估。
结果 治疗后A组HHS评分为(84.83±2.18)分,B组为(89.49±2.39)分,治疗前HHS评分分别为(57.11±8.32)分和(56.38±7.97)分,治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后B组HHS评分为(89.49±2.39)分,高于A组的(84.83±2.18)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后A组VAS评分为(4.65±1.03)分,B组为(3.02±0.87)分,治疗前VAS评分分别为(6.55±2.18)分和(6.47±1.95)分,治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后B组病人VAS评分(3.02±0.87)低于A组(4.65±1.03),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组治疗成功率(97.50%)高于A组(80.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论 相较于髓芯减压术联合同种异体骨移植,髓芯减压术人工椎板置入可提高股骨头坏死病人髋关节功能,改善临床疗效。

关键词: 髓芯减压术, 同种异体骨移植, 人工椎板置入, 股骨头坏死, 保髋关节

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical effect of core decompression combined with allogeneic bone grafting or artificial lamina implantation in the treatment of femoral head necrosis and hip joint preservation.
Methods Eighty patients with femoral head necrosis admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were divided into group A and group B;group A was treated with core decompression combined with allograft,and group B was treated Core decompression combined with artificial lamina implantation;HHS and VAS scoring systems were used to evaluate patients before and after treatment,and the success rate of patients’ treatment was evaluated.The patients were examined by X-ray before treatment and during follow-up,and the imaging changes were evaluated according to Arco staging.
Results After treatment,the HHS score of group A(84.83±2.18) and group B(89.49±2.39) were higher than those of before the treatment of group A(57.11±8.32) and group B(56.38±7.97)(P<0.05).After treatment,the HHS score of group B(89.49±2.39) was significantly higher than that of group A(84.83±2.18)(P<0.05);the VAS score of group A(4.65±1.03)  were significantly higher than those of  before the treatment of group A(6.55±2.18)(P<0.05).After treatment,the VAS score of group B(3.02±0.87) was significantly lower than that of  before the treatment of group B(6.47±1.95)(P<0.05).After treatment,the VAS score of group B(3.02±0.87) was significantly lower than that of group A(P<0.05).The treatment success rate of group B(97.50%) was significantly higher than that of group A(80.00%)(P<0.05).
Conclusion Compared with core decompression combined with allogeneic bone transplantation,core decompression with artificial lamina implantation can more effectively improve hip joint function in patients with femoral head necrosis and improve clinical efficacy.

Key words: core decompression, allogeneic bone transplantation, artificial laminar implantation, femoral head necrosis, hip joint preservation

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张业强;晏大学;高小见 . 急诊肋骨内固定手术对严重连枷胸患者恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 794 .
[2] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[3] 卓德强;徐志宏;汪明月;等. 不同介入治疗模式对晚期肝癌患者的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 937 .
[4] 杨晓辉;郑淑月;马云改;等. 医用臭氧联合类固醇激素治疗慢性腰椎间盘源性疼痛临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 954 .
[5] 刘思洋;郭荣. 一次性切口牵开固定器在腰腹部吸脂手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 948 .
[6] 唐健雄 . 疝和腹壁外科该怎样规范化的持续发展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 245 .
[7] 马颂章 . 腹股沟疝手术对男性患者生殖功能的影响 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 249 .
[8] 张成 克力木 汪忠镐 . 胃食管反流病的外科治疗进展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 254 .
[9] 苏福增 王志 张成等 . 嵌顿性腹股沟疝合并肾病综合征患者的围手术期处理 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 260 .
[10] 杜正文 高迎飞 王玉明等 . 乳腺癌围手术期应用快速康复外科的临床研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 263 .