临床外科杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 382-384.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.04.024

• • 上一篇    下一篇

超声清创联合湿性疗法在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用

  

  1. 武汉大学人民医院心内科
  • 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-20

Application of ultrasonic debridement combined with moist therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer

  • Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-20

摘要: 目的:探讨超声清创联合湿性疗法在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用价值。方法:2019年1月~2020年1月我院诊治的糖尿病足溃疡病人68例,按就诊顺序用随机数字表法将病人随机分入两组,超声清创联合湿性疗法为观察组,传统清创联合湿性疗法为对照组,每组各34例。记录两组病人糖尿病足溃疡伤口愈合情况、伤口局部组织血流灌注情况、伤口愈合时间和换药次数。结果:观察组病人首次治疗后第7天、第14天伤口愈合情况优于对照组[(33.13±3.05 )分vs.(35.19±3.82)分;(21.58±3.63 )分vs.(28.22±4.75)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。首次治疗后第14天,观察组病人伤口局部血流灌注情况明显优于对照组[(1.21±0.19 )PU vs.(0.83±0.15)PU],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组换药次数分别为(12.61±1.44)次和(20.44±2.40),愈合时间分别为(21.29±2.84 )天和(30.88±3.28)天,差异有统计学意义P<0.05)。结论:超声清创联合湿性疗法治疗糖尿病足溃疡伤口有明显的优势。

关键词: 超声清创, 湿性疗法, 糖尿病足溃疡

Abstract: Objective:To explore the value of ultrasonic debridement combined with moist therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer.Methods:68 patients with diabetic foot ulcer in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were randomly divided into two groups:the observation group and the control group,there were 34 cases in each group.Ultrasound debridement combined with moist therapy was the observation group,and traditional debridement combined with moist therapy was the control group,34 cases in each group.The wound healing,local tissue perfusion,wound healing time and dressing change times of diabetic foot ulcer in the two groups were recorded and analyzed statistically.Results:The wound healing of the observation group was better than that of the control group on the 7th and 14th day after the first treatment(33.13±3.05 vs.35.19±3.82,P<0.05;21.58±3.63 vs.28.22±4.75,P<0.05).On the 14th day after the first treatment,the local blood perfusion in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group[(1.21±0.19 )PU vs.(0.83±0.15)PU,P<0.05].The number of dressing changes and healing time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group[12.61±1.44 vs.20.44±2.40,P<0.05;(21.29±2.84)d vs.(30.88±3.28)d,P<0.05].Conclusion:Ultrasonic debridement combined with moist therapy has obvious advantages over traditional debridement combined with moist therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer wounds.

Key words: ultrasonic debridement, moist therapy, diabetic foot ulcer

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭海洋;罗良弢;严想元. 肠内营养与肠外营养在腹腔镜胃肠道肿瘤患者术后早期应用的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 910 .
[2] 俞松;黄辉. Perthes病的病因与临床诊疗现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 952 .
[3] 刘厚宝. 胆囊癌根治术联合肝外胆管切除的意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 408 .
[4] 余奇劲;杨云朝. 脊髓缺血性损伤时脑源性神经营养因子、丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶ε蛋白和mRNA含量的变化及远程缺血预处理干预作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(4): 307 .
[5] 王镇 陈鹏 王枫 柳硕岩. 食管癌加速康复外科实践单中心经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 647 -650 .
[6] 王涛 贾建博 辛向兵 朱爱林. 电视胸腔镜食管癌微创手术后呼吸衰竭发生风险的潜在影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 668 -670 .
[7] 黄致远, 刘勇, 梅洪亮. 快速康复外科理念在结肠癌合并肠梗阻病人中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 404 -407 .
[8] . 非外科处理的梗阻性黄疸:附五例病例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 0, (): 655 -658 .
[9] 张晓霞, 李明颖, 孙晓黎, 王振元. 经肛门内镜下直肠病变微创切除术中严重皮下气肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 924 .
[10] 刘永琛, 宋牧野, 吴泽宇. 微创介入治疗在甲状腺疾病中的应用与争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 221 -223 .