临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 581-584.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250544

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

原发性巨大胃肠间质瘤的外科治疗

张再重 赵盼 肖春红 王梅平 洪伟煊 房俊伟 王烈   

  1. 350025 福建福州,福建医科大学福总临床医学院(厦门大学附属东方医院,福建中医药大学福总临床教学医院,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院)普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-26 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 王烈,Email:fzptwk@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2022J01489);联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院面上项目(2022MS01)

Surgical treatment of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor

ZHANG Zaizhong,ZHAO Pan,XIAO Chunhong,WANG Meiping,HONG Weixuan,FANG Junwei,WANG Lie   

  1. Department of General Surgery,Fujian Medical University Fuzhong Clinical Medical College(Xiamen University Affiliated Dongfang Hospital,Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Fuzhong Clinical Teaching Hospital,Joint Logistics Support Unit 900 Hospital),Fuzhou 350025,China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-20

摘要: 目的 探讨原发性巨大(孤立性病灶最大径>10cm)胃肠间质瘤(gastrointestinal stromal tumor,GIST)的外科治疗体会。方法 回顾性分析2018年1月~2024年12月收治的67例原发性巨大GIST病人的临床和病理资料,其中经术前新辅助治疗(有效25例、无效10例)后行外科手术35例(新辅助治疗组);因初诊评估预期能够实现根治性(R0)切除(13例)或术前合并急症(12例)或难以获取穿刺活检病理诊断(7例)未行新辅助治疗而直接手术32例(直接手术组)。比较两组一般资料、肿瘤情况、手术情况、术后恢复、术后病理、术后辅助治疗和复发情况。结果 新辅助治疗组和直接手术组病人性别、年龄、原发肿瘤部位、初诊最大径、生长类型、初诊影像学评估为局限性或局部进展期、术后随访时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。新辅助治疗组和直接手术组术前肿瘤最大径分别为(12.4±7.1)cm、(18.2±5.0) cm,手术时间分别为(125.4±30.6)分钟、(153.0±31.7)分钟,术中出血量分别为(228.3±76.4)ml、(300.3±67.2)ml,术后住院时间分别为(9.1±2.6)天、(11.1±3.2)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);新辅助治疗组腹腔镜手术比例为17.1%,高于直接手术组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中肿瘤破裂、联合脏器切除比例、术后并发症、术后复发方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 原发性巨大GIST大多可通过新辅助治疗实现缩瘤降期,创造微创手术机会,但新辅助治疗期间也存在肿瘤进展导致手术难度增大甚至失去根治性手术机会的风险。

关键词: 胃肠间质瘤; 巨大; 新辅助治疗; 外科手术

Abstract: Objective To explore the surgical treatment experience of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST)(with isolated lesions with a maximum diameter > 10cm).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and pathological data of 67 patients with primary giant GIST admitted from January 2018 to December 2024.Among them, 35 cases underwent surgical operations after preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (25 effective cases and 10 ineffective cases) (neoadjuvant therapy group).Due to the initial diagnosis assessment expecting radical (R0) resection (13 cases), or preoperative complications (12 cases), or difficulty in obtaining a pathological diagnosis through puncture biopsy (7 cases), 32 cases underwent direct surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (direct surgery group).Compare the general information,tumor condition,surgical condition,postoperative recovery,postoperative pathology,postoperative adjuvant therapy,and recurrence between two groups.Results Comparative analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05) between the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group in terms of gender,age,primary tumor location,initial maximum diameter,growth type,localized or locally advanced stage,and postoperative follow-up time.The maximum diameters of the tumors before surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group and the direct surgery group were (12.4±7.1)cm and (18.2±5.0) cm respectively, and the operation times were (125.4±30.6) minutes and (153.0±31.7) minutes respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was (228.3±76.4)ml and (300.3±67.2)ml, respectively. The postoperative hospital stay was (9.1±2.6) days and (11.1±3.2) days, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).The proportion of laparoscopic surgery in the neoadjuvant therapy group was 17.1%, which was higher than that in the direct surgery group (0), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the proportion of tumor rupture, combined organ resection, postoperative complications and postoperative recurrence (P>0.05).Conclusion Primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumors can mostly be reduced in size and progression through neoadjuvant therapy,improving the chances of minimally invasive surgery.However,there is also a risk of tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy leading to increased surgical difficulty or even loss of curative surgical opportunities.

Key words: gastrointestinal stromal tumor;giant;neoadjuvant therapy;surgery

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[3] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[4] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[5] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[6] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[7] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .
[8] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[9] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[10] 吴超;谢迪;汪全新;等. 胃癌肝转移的临床病理特征及危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 839 .