临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1056-1059.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.11.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

穿刺针式抓钳辅助双孔腹腔镜在阑尾切除术中的应用

徐乾辉现工作单位为福建医科大学附属漳州市医院胃小肠软组织肉瘤外科   

  1. 350025 福州,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院/福建医科大学福总临床医学院/厦门大学附属东方医院普通外科(徐乾辉、张再重、刘文炽、陈少全、王烈、林立英);福建医科大学附属第一医院急诊外科(刘文炽)
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-22 接受日期:2021-11-22 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:林立英,Email:fzptwk@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院临床应用研究专项(2019L11);福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2020J011139)

Needle type pliers assisted laparoscopic double holes in application of appendectomy

  1. Department of General Surgery,900th Hospital Joint Logistics Support Force,Fuzhou General Hospital of Fujian Medical University,East Hospital Affiliated To Xiamen University,Fuzhou 350025,China
  • Received:2021-11-22 Accepted:2021-11-22 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-11-20

摘要: 目的 比较穿刺针式抓钳辅助双孔腹腔镜与常规三孔腹腔镜治疗急性阑尾炎的临床效果。 方法 2019年6月~2020年9月就诊于我院的急性阑尾炎病人60例,随机分为常规三孔组和穿刺抓钳组,每组各30例,常规三孔组采用常规三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,穿刺抓钳组采用穿刺针式抓钳辅助双孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,术后随访6个月,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、穿刺时间、手术切口长度、切口缝合时间、术后并发症等指标。 结果 两组手术时间、术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);穿刺抓钳组和常规三孔组穿刺时间分别为(40.86±10.45)秒和(60.75±11.45)秒,手术切口长度分别为(20.15±3.41)mm和(27.61±3.12)mm,切口缝合时间分别为(4.22±0.86)分钟和(5.35±0.75)分钟,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后肛门排气时间,住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);穿刺抓钳组和常规三孔组术后24小时切口疼痛评分分别为(2.11±0.25)和(2.27±0.30),术后3个月手术瘢痕长度分别为(22.15±3.42)mm和(33.24±4.32)mm,术后切口满意度分别为(4.75±0.34)和(4.33±0.48),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访6个月,两组Trocar孔感染、腹腔感染等术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 穿刺针式抓钳辅助双孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术操作简单、实用性强,不增加手术难度和手术时间,减少手术切口长度、减轻术后疼痛,达到更美观效果。

关键词: 穿刺针式抓钳, 双孔腹腔镜, 阑尾炎切除术

Abstract: Objective To compare the puncture needle type grab clamp three hole laparoscopic assisted laparoscopic and conventional double holes clinical effect in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods June 2019-September 2020 in our hospital of 60 patients with acute appendicitis,were randomly divided into normal group and the three hole piercing forceps group,30 cases each,regular conventional three out of three hole hole laparoscopic appendectomy,piercing,scratching clamp group adopted needle type pliers auxiliary double hole laparoscopic appendectomy,postoperative follow-up of 6 months,compared two groups of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,puncture time,incision length,cut suture time,postoperative complications such as index. Results Two groups of operation time,intraoperative blood loss comparison differences had no statistical significance(P>0.05).Biopsy forceps group in puncture time[(40.86±10.45)s vs (60.75±11.45)s],incision[(20.15±3.41)mm vs (27.61±3.12mm)], incision suture time[(4.22±0.86)s vs (5.35±0.75)s] was less than the conventional three hole group,difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).Two groups of anal exhaust time,postoperative hospitalization days there was no significant difference(P>0.05).Biopsy forceps group in 24 hours of postoperative incision pain score(2.11±0.25 vs 2.27±0.30),3 months after surgery scar length[(22.15±3.42)mm vs (33.24±4.32)mm] and the degree of postoperative incision(4.75±0.34 vs 4.33±0.48) was superior to the conventional three hole group,difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).Followed up for 6 months,two groups of postoperative complication such as infection,abdominal cavity infection in Trocar hole had no obvious difference,no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion Needle type grab clamp auxiliary double hole laparoscopic appendectomy operation is simple,practical strong,does not increase operation difficulty and operation time,clinical feasibility is strong,reduce incision length,reduce postoperative pain,achieve more beautiful effect.

Key words: needle type pliers, double hole laparoscopic, appendix resection

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!