临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 801-804.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.09.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

保守与手术治疗小儿膀胱输尿管反流疗效及适应证分析

  

  1. 广州市花都区妇幼保健院(胡忠医院)小儿外科
  • 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-09-20

Conservative and surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children and its indications

  • Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-09-20

摘要: 目的:探究保守与手术治疗小儿膀胱输尿管反流疗效及适应证。方法:选取我院收治的小儿膀胱输尿管反流患儿100例,使用随机数字表法将其分为保守组(50例)及手术组(50例),同时根据患儿不同反流等级将两组细分为保守轻中度组(26例),手术轻中度组(22例)及保守重度组(24例)、手术重度组(28例),保守组使用保守(抗生素治疗及盆底肌训练)治疗,手术组采用腹腔镜输尿管膀胱再植术进行治疗,比较不同程度患儿不同治疗方式治疗疗效及治疗前后尿动力学指标,比较两种治疗方式下患儿并发症发生率。结果:保守轻中度组与手术轻中度组治疗有效率分别为84.62%和90.91%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术重度组治疗有效率(92.86%)显著高于保守重度组(58.33%)(P<0.05);治疗前保守轻中度组,手术轻中度组及保守重度组、手术重度组尿动力学指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);保守轻中度组治疗前后最大尿流率为(13.25±6.30)ml/s和(7.34±5.89)ml/s,最大膀胱容量分别为(209.82±86.94)ml、(141.36±51.08)ml,均显著升高(P<0.05);残余尿量分别为(14.59±12.17)ml、(84.27±77.24)ml,治疗后显著降低(P<0.05)。手术轻中度组治疗前后最大尿流率为(13.17±6.28)ml/s和(7.41±5.92)ml/s,最大膀胱容量分别为(215.69±87.56)ml、(142.75±51.12)ml,均显著升高(P<0.05);残余尿量分别为(13.28±11.83)ml、(84.03±77.16)ml ,治疗后显著降低(P<0.05);两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术重度组和保守重度组治疗后最大尿流率分别为(12.93±5.96)ml/s、(7.84±5.85)ml/s,最大膀胱容量分别为(209.36±88.17)ml、(139.58±75.49)ml,残余尿量分别为(19.37±16.70)ml、(41.29±21.58)ml,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。保守组复发性尿路感染发生率(16%)及输尿管梗阻发生率(8%)显著低于手术组(44%和36%),抗生素耐药发生率(72%)显著高于手术组(16%)(P<0.05),两组肾功能损害发生率(24%和32%)及肾瘢痕形成发生率(20%和12%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:保守与手术治疗小儿膀胱输尿管反流各有优点,对轻中度患儿,建议采用保守治疗,对重度患儿,使用手术治疗疗效更佳。 

关键词: 保守治疗, 手术治疗, 小儿膀胱输尿管反流, 疗效, 适应证

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the efficacy and indications of conservative and surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children.Methods:One hundred patients with vesicoureteral reflux in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were enrolled in the study.They were randomly divided into a conservative group(50 cases)and a surgical group(50 cases).At the same time,according to the different reflux grades of the children,the two groups were subdivided into the conservative mild to moderate group(26 cases),the operation mild to moderate group(22 cases)and the conservative severe group(24 cases)and the surgical severe group(28 cases).The conservative group was treated with conservative(antibiotic treatment and pelvic floor muscle training),〖JP〗and the operation group was treated with laparoscopic ureteral bladder replantation.The therapeutic effects of different treatments and the urodynamic parameters before and after treatment were compared.The incidence of complications was compared between the two treatments.Results:The effective rate of conservative mild and moderate group was 84.62% and 90.91%,respectively(P>0.05).The effective rate of severe operation group(92.86%)was significantly higher than that of conservative severe operation group(58.33%)P<0.05).There was no significant difference in urodynamic indexes between the conservative mild and moderate group before treatment,the operation mild and moderate group,the operation severe group and the operation severe group(P>0.05).The maximum urinary flow rate of the conservative mild to moderate group befor and after treatment were(13.25±6.30)ml/s to(7.34±5.89)ml/s,the maximum bladder volume were(209.82±86.94)ml to(141.36±51.08)ml,which was significantly increased(P<0.05);the residual urine volume were(14.59±12.17)ml to(84.27±77.24)ml,which was significantly reduced after treatment(P<0.05).The maximum urinary flow rate of the operation mild to moderate group befor and after treatment were(13.17±6.28)ml/s to(7.41±5.92)ml/s,and the maximum bladder volume were(215.69±87.56)ml to(142.75±51.12)ml,which was significantly increased(P<0.05),and the residual urine volume was(13.28±11.83)ml to(84.03±77.16)ml,which was significantly decrease(P<0.05).The maximum urinary flow rate of the severe operation group and conservative severe group was(12.93±5.96)ml/s and(7.84±5.85)ml/s,the maximum bladder capacity were(209.36±88.17)ml and(139.58±75.49)ml,the residual urine volume were(19.37±16.70)ml adn(41.29±21.58)ml,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The conservative group and operated groups with recurrent urinary tract infection(16% vs.44%)and ureteral obstruction(8% vs 36%)were significantly lower than the surgical group,the incidence of antibiotic resistance(72% vs.16%)was statistically significant which compared with the operation group(P<0.05),there was no significant difference in the incidence of renal dysfunction(24% vs.32%)and renal scar formation(20% vs.12%)(P>0.05).Conclusion:Conservative and surgical treatment of vesicoureteral ureteral reflux have advan:tages.For mild to moderate children,conservative treatment is recommended.For severe children,surgical treatment is better.

Key words: conservative treatment, surgical treatment, vescioureteral reflux, efficacy, indications

[1] 谢群, 张瑞瑞, 山超等. 人工真皮移植联合藻酸盐辅料治疗糖尿病足的疗效评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 813-815.
[2] 陈迎春, 尧小龙, 别毕洲, 汪志忠, 冯娟娟, 张纯, 李欢欢, 盛柳青, 李俊. 定位导向双靶点双通道锥颅治疗高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 674-676.
[3] 石乔, 刘垒, 张晓艺, 荣愈平, 熊星铖, 常剑, 王卫星, 陶京. 国内应用吉西他滨联合高强度聚焦超声治疗中晚期胰腺癌疗效的Meta分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 680-683.
[4] 刘俊鹏, 曾勇超, 苏洋. 肝血管肉瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 727-728.
[5] 康敢军, 黄杰. 颈胸交界处肿瘤的个性化外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 552-554.
[6] 吴开明, 姚龙, 康宁宁等. 进展期食管癌微创治疗术后远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 558-561.
[7] 张磊, 孙昱, 黄熠. 经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与切开挂线术治疗经括约肌肛瘘的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.
[8] 万婷, 周海孝, 朱占永, 余墨声. 蝎肽抗菌凝胶联合外科手术治疗下肢静脉性溃疡的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 512-513.
[9] 王誉都, 李鹏, 高亚, 黄强. 单孔腹腔镜下经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 517-519.
[10] 张明府, 吴永丰, 柳东. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉对术后吻合口漏及近期疗效的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 400-403.
[11] 许恒, 董顺军. 胸腔巨大孤立性纤维瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 432-433.
[12] 唐云德, 徐卫国, 于风珍, 尚林强. 椎间孔镜微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 439-442.
[13] 王璇, 张昊, 党诚学. 食管胃结合部肿瘤的治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 446-448.
[14] 于琦, 王钢乐. 非哺乳期乳腺炎的临床诊治研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 201-203.
[15] 方红, 赵子伟, 韩雪, 姚永强. 麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 205-208.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李绍春, 涂彦渊, 唐健雄. 机器人手术时代对疝外科的挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 731 -733 .
[2] 秦昌富, 陈杰, 申英末等. 中国疝病注册登记随访系统对我国疝和腹壁外科的推动作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 734 -736 .
[3] 李健文, 唐健雄. 疝外科缝合技术与缝合材料选择中国专家共识(2018版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 737 -739 .
[4] 顾岩, 杨建军, 宋致成等. 腹壁疝组织结构分离技术的进展和改革[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 739 -742 .
[5] 闵凯, 吴彪. 复杂腹壁疝修补手术的选择和技术改进前景[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 743 -744 .
[6] 陈双, 周太成. 食管裂孔疝解剖学观点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 745 -747 .
[7] 罗文, 段鑫, 柯文杰等. 疝修补术后慢性疼痛的临床特征和诊断治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 748 -750 .
[8] 刘鹭, 穆磊, 周毅. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的诊疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 751 -753 .
[9] 陈华涛, 邵永胜, 李晓辉等. 伴有同侧全髋关节置换手术史的腹股沟疝手术术式的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 754 -756 .
[10] 王波:彭美红:江海等. 腹腔镜治疗成人Morgagni疝致肠梗阻一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 756 -757 .