临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 425-428.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240923

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜肾部分切除术病人糖脂代谢、Mayo粘连概率评分与肾周脂肪粘连及预后关系

曹振虎,刘龙强   

  1. 716000 陕西省延安市人民医院泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-12 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘龙强,Email:miwaiyi126.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省延安市重点研发计划项目(2023SLSFGG-014)

Relationship between glucose and lipid metabolism,MAP score,perirenal fat adhesion and surgical efficacy in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

CAO Zhenhu,LIU Longqiang   

  1. Department of Urology,Yan’an People’s Hospital,Shaanxi,Yan’an 716000,China
  • Received:2024-06-12 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-04-20

摘要: 目的 探讨腹腔镜肾部分切除术病人糖脂代谢、Mayo粘连概率(MAP)评分与肾周脂肪粘连及预后的关系。方法 2019年12月~2022年12月行腹腔镜肾部分切除术病人84例,根据术中是否发生肾周脂肪粘连(APF)将病人分为APF组(44例)和非APF组(40例);术后1年随访结果肿瘤是否复发分为预后良好组(68例)和预后不良组(16例)。术前记录病人性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、空腹血糖(FPG)、血清甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和MAP评分。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析糖脂代谢和MAP评分对APF的评估价值,采用多因素Logistic回归分析 LPN预后的影响因素。结果 APF组和非APF组病人的性别、年龄、BMI、FPG、TG、HDL-C和MAP评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC曲线分析显示,FPG、TG、HDL-C和MAP评分APF有一定的评估价值,且四者联合评估的整体效能更好;预后良好组和预后不良组病人的性别、年龄、BMI、APF、FPG、TG、HDL-C、MAP评分和APF差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,FPG、TG、HDL-C和MAP评分均为LPN预后不良的危险因素。结论 FPG、TG、HDL-C和MAP评分对APF有一定的评估价值,具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,四者联合评估的整体效能更好;FPG、TG、HDL-C和MAP评分均为LPN预后不良的危险因素。

关键词: 腹腔镜肾部分切除术, 糖脂代谢, MAP评分, 肾周脂肪粘连, 预后

Abstract: Objective To investigate the glucose and lipid metabolism,Mayo adhesion probability (MAP) score and perirenal function in patients with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy The relationship between fat adhesion and prognosis.Methods A total of 84 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively selected as the research subjects.According to whether perirenal fatty adhesion (APF) occurred during the operation,the patients were divided into APF group (44 cases) and non-APF group (40 cases).The results of 1-year follow-up were divided into good prognosis group (68 cases) and poor prognosis group (16 cases) The patient’s gender,age,body mass index (BMI),fasting blood glucose (FPG),serum triglyceride (TG),high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and MAP score were recorded before surgery.All patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy,and the receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to analyze the evaluation value of glucose and lipid metabolism and MAP score for APF.Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of LPN.Results There were statistically significant differences in gender,age,BMI,APF,FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP scores between the APF group and the non-APF group (P<0.05);ROC curve analysis showed that FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP Scoring APF has certain evaluation value,and the overall performance of the combined evaluation of the four was better.There were significant differences in gender,age,BMI,FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP scores between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group (P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP scores,APF were all risk factors for ineffective LPN surgery.Conclusion FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP scores have a certain value for APF evaluation,with high sensitivity and specificity,and the overall efficiency of the combined evaluation is better.FPG,TG,HDL-C and MAP scores were all risk factors for ineffective LPN surgery.

Key words: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, glucose and lipid metabolism, MAP score, perirenal fat adhesion, surgical efficacy

[1] 邓亦奇, 孙永杰, 邹士东, 王乃国, 汪明星. 椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症病人血清炎性指标与短期预后的相关性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(4): 375-378.
[2] 潘均昊, 王春晖. 基于SEER数据库构建远处转移性肝细胞癌的预后预测模型[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(4): 410-415.
[3] 仇睿 刘阳 马波 吕志平 马云帆. 切除修复交叉互补族6-样表达与非小细胞肺癌临床病理特征的关系及其预后意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 266-270.
[4] 林锦超 郁毅刚. 血清烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸氧化酶2水平与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血病人脑组织血供及预后的相关性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(2): 134-138.
[5] 陈壮 赵心恺 王文君 邱珊珊. 胃癌病人组织中环指跨膜蛋白2、微纤维相关蛋白2(MFAP2)、AF4/FMR2家族成员3表达与肿瘤病理特征及预后的相关性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(2): 144-148.
[6] 赵国栋, 黄刚. 肾移植受者BK多瘤病毒感染临床诊疗国际指南(第2版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 63-66.
[7] 彭蓉蓉, 卞家蓉, 谈王蓉. 血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、基质细胞衍生因子1和诱饵受体3联合在非小细胞肺癌病人预后评估中的临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 92-96.
[8] 严萍萍, 张绍东, 郭皎亮, 窦燕东. Luminal B型乳腺癌组织中XAF1、PCK1表达及与病人预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 97-101.
[9] 李林, 陈楚鹰, 何久圣, 张浩. 切开复位内固定术联合韧带修复治疗踝关节骨折合并下胫腓前韧带断裂的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 105-108.
[10] 秦乐 衡怡鑫 徐佳鑫 黄宁 邓胜和 古俊楠 毛富巍 薛一凡 蒋振兴 王军 程登龙 曹英豪 蔡开琳. 结直肠癌合并肝骨转移病人预后评分系统的开发和验证:一项回顾性队列研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(9): 947-954.
[11] 于青 郑媛媛 张莉 张志华. 药物涂层球囊经皮腔内血管成形术对下肢动脉长段闭塞病人临床指标及预后的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(9): 976-979.
[12] 康树宏 吕峰 倪云峰 贠俊茹. 微小核糖核酸-27a、微小核糖核酸-1299预测食管癌病人术后预后的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 803-806.
[13] 王娜 孙伟伟 邢国靖 赵金雷 孙群. 血清基质金属蛋白酶-9、热休克蛋白47水平与急性脑出血术后预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 818-821.
[14] 何朝滨 李升平. 不可逆电穿孔治疗胰腺癌[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 673-676.
[15] 徐业成 傅德良. 胰腺全切除术在胰腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 677-679.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[3] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[4] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[5] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[6] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[7] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[8] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[9] 安永德;李新源;郭亚民;等. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术中转开腹74例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 758 .
[10] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .