临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 317-320.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜外侧入路联合经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎结核的疗效分析

李静 郜勇 陈超 李良黎   

  1. 433299 湖北省洪湖市人民医院骨外科(李静),康复医学科(李良黎);华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院骨外科(郜勇,陈超)
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-03 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 李良黎,Email:604382612@qq.com

Efficacy analysis of the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis using oblique lateral approach combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation

LI Jing,GAO Yong,CHEN Chao,LI Liangli   

  1. Department of Orthopedics,the People's Hospital of Honghu,Honghu 433299,China
  • Received:2024-01-03 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-03-20

摘要: 目的 分析斜外侧入路联合经皮椎弓根螺钉治疗腰椎结核的总体效果,并评价其与单纯后路病灶清除植骨融合内固定术的疗效差异。方法 2020年1月~2022年10月收治的腰椎结核病人29例,按治疗方法不同分为两组,观察组18例,采用斜外侧入路病灶清除植骨融合+后路经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定;对照组11例,采用单纯后路病灶清除植骨融合椎弓根螺钉内固定术。比较两组手术时间与术中出血量,随访记录两组病人结核病灶愈合情况、ASIA分级、椎间植骨融合情况,VAS评分、ODI评分、Cobb角及其并发症,随访12个月。结果 两组手术时间和术中出血 量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有病人结核病灶均痊愈,神经功能ASIA分级为E级,椎间植骨融合率均为100%。观察组和对照组术后3天、3个月、12个月VSA评分分别为(3.79 ± 0.57)°和 (4.27±0.61)°,(0.95±0.43)°和(1.44±0.42)°,(0.53±0.20)°和(0.76±0.19)°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组术后3天、3个月、12个月ODI评分分别为(29.94±2.84)°和 (31.36±2.58)°,(8.94±1.98)°和(11.27±2.19)°,(9.28±2.52)°和(12.72±1.90)°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组术后3天、3个月、12个月Cobb角分别为(41.82±2.35)°和 (41.5±2.72)°,(41.28±1.67)°和(41.18±1.60)°(39.33 ±3.52)°和(38.46±2.75)°,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 两种术式均能促进结核病灶愈合和植骨融合,斜外侧入路联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术具有损伤小、功能恢复佳的优点。

关键词: 斜外侧入路;经皮椎弓根螺钉;腰椎结核;病灶清除;植骨融合

Abstract: Objective To assess the efficacy of the oblique lateral approach with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spinal tuberculosis and compare it with conventional posterior surgery.Methods A retrospective study analyzed 29 patients treated for lumbar spinal tuberculosis in our hospital from January 2020 to October 2022.They were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods,the observational group (18 case) underwent oblique lateral lesion clearance,bone graft fusion,and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation,while the control group (11 case) received conventional posterior lesion clearance,bone graft fusion,and internal fixation surgery.The operative time and intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups.Operation time and intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups,the healing of tuberculosis foci, ASIA grade, intervertebral bone graft fusion, VAS score, ODI score, Cobb Angle and complications were recorded in the two groups,follow-up was 12 months.Results There was no statistically significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients' tuberculosis foci healed, and the neurological function ASIA classification was E level, with an intervertebral bone graft fusion rate of 100%. The VAS scores of the observation group and the control group at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery were (3.79 ± 0.57) ° vs (4.27±0.61) °, (0.95±0.43) ° vs (1.44±0.42) °, (0.53±0.20) ° vs (0.76±0.19) °, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The ODI scores of the observation group and the control group at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery were (29.94±2.84) ° vs (31.36±2.58) °, (8.94±1.98) ° vs (11.27±2.19) °, (9.28±2.52) ° vs (12.72±1.90) °, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The Cobb angles of the observation group and the control group at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery were (41.82±2.35) ° vs (41.5±2.72) °, (41.28±1.67) ° vs (41.18±1.60) °, (39.33 ±3.52) ° vs (38.46±2.75) °, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Both surgical techniques can promote the healing of tuberculosis lesions and bone graft fusion. The oblique lateral approach combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation has the advantages of minimal invasiveness and better functional recovery.

Key words: oblique lateral approach;percutaneous pedicle screw fixation;lumbar spinal tuberculosis;lesion clearance;bone graft fusion

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[3] 林俊. 原发性中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤供者在器官移植中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[4] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[5] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[6] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[7] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[8] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[9] 江帆;孙权;吴国俊;等. 不同引流方式对恶性梗阻性黄疸患者细胞免疫的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 760 .
[10] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .