临床外科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 845-848.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10056483.2018.11.014

• • 上一篇    下一篇

直径大于5cm非小细胞肺癌行全胸腔镜肺叶切除术后放置单胸管引流的可行性分析

  

  1. 617068  四川省攀枝花市第二人民医院胸外科(彭俊、骆艳丽、李民杰);四川大学华西医院外科(王允)
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-03

The feasibility of placing single chest tube drainage after total thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer(NSCLC) greater than 5cm in diameter

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,the Second People's Hospital of Panzhihua City,Sichuan Province,Panzhihua 617068,China
  • Received:2018-06-20 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-12-03

摘要: 目的  探讨直径>5cm非小细胞肺癌行全胸腔镜肺叶切除术后放置单胸管引流的可行性。 方法 行全胸腔镜肺叶切除术的非小细胞肺癌病人120例,直径均>5cm,根据住院先后顺序编号,再按随机数字表分为两组;对照组60例,术后放置双胸管引流;观察组60例,术后放置单胸管引流;比较两组胸腔引流量、胸腔引流时间、拔管后胸腔穿刺抽液次数、术后住院时间、术后第1天及30天的视觉模拟(visual analogue scale/score,VAS)评分、术后第1天及3天的肺扩张度、再次置管率、切口并发症发生率、胸腔感染率、胸腔积气积液率、术后30天死亡率。结果  两组胸腔引流量、胸腔引流时间、拔管后胸腔穿刺抽液次数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后住院时间为(5.12±0.24)天,显著短于对照组的(5.73±0.57)天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后第1天及30天的VAS评分分别为(3.96±0.07)分、(1.27±0.02)分,对照组分别为(4.51±0.04)分、(1.69±0.02)分,两组术后第1天及30天的VAS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后第1天及3天的肺扩张度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组再次置管率为0、切口并发症发生率为3.33%、胸腔感染率为1.67%、胸腔积气积液率为1.67%、术后30天,死亡率为0,对照组分别为0、6.67%、3.33%、0、0,两组再次置管率及相关并发症发生情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论  直径>5cm的非小细胞肺癌病人行全胸腔镜肺叶切除术后放置单胸管引流是可行的,引流效果及安全性应值得肯定,在减轻病人术后疼痛方面较双胸管引流更有优势。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 全胸腔镜肺叶切除术,  , 单胸管,  , 双胸管, 引流

Abstract: Objective    To investigate the feasibility of placing single chest tube drainage after total thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with NSCLC greater than 5cm in diameter. Methods Take a prospective controlled study,selected 120 patients with NSCLC greater than 5cm in diameter who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy in our hospital.According to the order of hospitalization,then check the random number table into two groups:sixty patients in the control group received double chest tube drainage after operation,the observation group consisted of 60 patients and a single chest tube drainage was placed after the operation.Comparing the two groups of chest drainage,chest drainage time,number of chest punctures after extubation,postoperative hospital stay,visual analogue scale/score(VAS) scores,lung expansion on the 1st and 30th postoperative,reintubation rate,incision complication rate,chest infection rate,pleural effusion rate,and postoperative mortality at 30 days after operation on the 1st and 3rd postoperative day.Results  There were no significant differences in chest drainage,chest drainage time and chest puncture drainage after extubation(P>0.05).The postoperative hospital stay(5.12±0.24)d in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(5.73±0.57)d,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS scores of the observation group on the 1st and 30th day after surgery were(3.96±0.07) points and(1.27±0.02) points,respectively,and the control group were(4.51±0.04) points and(1.69±0.02) points,respectively.Tthe VAS scores of the two groups on the 1st and 30th day after operation were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in lung dilatation between the two groups on the 1st and 3rd postoperative(P>0.05).In the observation group,the rate of reintubation was 0,the incidence of incision complications was 3.33%,the rate of chest infection was 1.67%,the rate of pleural effusion was 1.67%,and the mortality rate was 0 after 30 days.The control group was 0,6.67%,3.33%,0,0,respectively.There was no significant difference in the rate of reintubation and related complications between the two groups(P>0.05).〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖WTBZ〗〓It is feasible to perform single chest tube drainage after thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with NSCLC greater than 5cm in diameter,drainage effect and safety should be worthy of recognition.Compared with double thoracic drainage,it is superior in reducing postoperative pain.

Key words: nonsmall cell lung cancer, total thoracoscopic lobectomy, single chest tube, double chest tube, drainage

[1] 王国义 梁剑峰 田锦林 鲍峰. 内镜直视与X线透视下支架置入术治疗晚期食管贲门癌临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 679-682.
[2] 马跃峰 邢鑫 马震川 孔冉冉 孙良璋 乔哲 李少民. 术中肋间神经阻滞联合术后静脉使用镇痛泵对开胸术后镇痛效果的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 686-688.
[3] 张亦超 熊涛 陈淑娟 胡航 丁召 钱群. 痔上黏膜环切术后并发直肠囊肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 720-720.
[4] 彭银杰 李印 陈威鹏 凃成志 袁俊 马海波 秦建军. 老年cT1N0M0食管癌病人内镜和手术治疗预后分析:基于SEER数据库[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 651-656.
[5] 陈传贵 段晓峰 姜宏景. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助对比胸腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 715-718.
[6] 谭锋维 薛奇 牟巨伟 高禹舜 毛友生 王大力 赵峻李宁 王镇 高树庚 赫捷. 从最新指南解读食管胃交界部腺癌的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 641-643.
[7] 陆超敬 洪江 李鑫 杨立信. 经口置入钉砧头系统在颈段及胸上段食管癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 662-664.
[8] 邹文彬 邓豫 付向宁 吴骁伟. 分层缝合加带蒂大网膜包埋在食管良性破裂修补术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 665-667.
[9] 王涛 贾建博 辛向兵 朱爱林. 电视胸腔镜食管癌微创手术后呼吸衰竭发生风险的潜在影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 668-670.
[10] 冯锦腾 范坤 张广健 付军科 高蕊. 食管异物202例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 683-685.
[11] 赵悦 任海军. 不同时机微创颅内血肿穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、脑源性神经营养因子和同型半胱氨酸水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 689-692.
[12] 赵选忠 金志宏 谢晓亮. 重组人尿激酶原(普佑克)经导管溶栓在急性下肢动脉血栓中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 822-824.
[13] 沈旭辉 邹建军. 血管腔内治疗在椎动脉夹层动脉瘤中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 825-827.
[14] 徐迪 林强 袁冰 吴建伟 张中保 李雪萍. 围手术期康复临床路径在防治老年病人髋部骨折全髋关节成形术后静脉血栓栓塞的作用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 828-830.
[15] 马人杰 贺琦 张海伟 张俊华 郑荣. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝的近期疗效及安全性观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 862-864.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!