临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 323-327.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250771

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

丙泊酚与七氟醚交替维持对长时间腹部手术病人麻醉苏醒质量的影响

廖家涛 周翔 谈世刚 余迪 黎笔熙 宋晓阳   

  1. 430070 湖北武汉,中部战区总医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 出版日期:2026-05-08 发布日期:2026-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 周翔,Email:zhouxiang188483@126.com;谈世刚,Email:420109200@qq.com

The influence of alternating maintenance with propofoland sevoflurane on the quality of recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing long abdominal surgeries

LIAO Jiatao,ZHOU Xiang,TAN Shigang,YU Di,LI Bixi,SONG Xiaoyang   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,General Hospital of Central Theater Command,Wuhan 430070,China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 目的 探讨丙泊酚与七氟醚间断交替维持对长时间腹部手术病人麻醉苏醒时间和苏醒质量的影响。方法 2023年6月~2024年6月择期行腹部手术病人90例,采用电脑随机数字表法分为三组:丙泊酚静脉维持组(A组)、丙泊酚复合七氟醚持续维持组(B组)和丙泊酚、七氟醚间断交替维持组(C组),每组各30例。所有病人常规静脉诱导后行气管插管,脑电双频指数(BIS)全程监测,A组由丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼持续泵注维持,B组由丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼复合七氟醚持续维持,C组由丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼与七氟醚间断交替维持。记录所有病人围术期各种麻醉药物用量,术毕病人自主呼吸恢复时间、意识清醒时间、拔管时间、总恢复时间,评价苏醒时躁动程度(RS)评分和Ramsay镇静评分,记录围术期麻醉相关不良反应及并发症,统计病人术后入住ICU时间、总住院时间及住院费用。结果 A、B、C组丙泊酚用量分别为(1740.3±385.6)mg、(1243.2±278.5)mg、(1055.1±245.8)mg,B、C组七氟醚用量分别为 (39.83±9.20)mg、(28.33±4.25)mg,与A、B组相比,C组丙泊酚及七氟醚用量更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组病人术后自主呼吸恢复时间为(15.43±14.90)分钟、意识清醒时间为(15.90±14.59)分钟、拔管时间为(42.82±37.23)分钟,总恢复时间为(44.03±12.68)分钟均短于A组[(56.73±47.23)分钟、(57.03±47.83)分钟、(66.43±47.94)分钟、(93.80±48.68)分钟]、B组[(31.57±26.04)分钟、(31.17±26.06)分钟、(39.60±26.30)分钟、(65.43±34.18)分钟],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A、B、C组RS评分分别为(1.33±0.92)分、(0.83±0.70)分、(0.33±0.55)分,Ramsay镇静评分分别为(2.87±0.94)分、(2.43±0.73)分、(1.90±0.40)分,均依次降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组术后呛咳、躁动、恶心呕吐、血压下降的发生率分别为26.7%、36.7%、23.3%、30%,C组分别为6.7%、6.7%、3.3%、10%,C组均低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与A组[(2.53±1.14)天、(25.53±13.17)天、(9.32±1.98)万元]相比,C组病人入住ICU时间(1.50±0.68)天及住院时间(20.37±6.67)天更短,住院费用(8.48±1.07)万元更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 丙泊酚与七氟醚间断交替维持可以安全有效的用于长时间麻醉维持,较全凭静脉及传统静吸复合麻醉苏醒更快,苏醒质量更高,且能减少住院时间及费用。

关键词: 丙泊酚; 七氟醚; 交替维持; 苏醒质量; 全身麻醉

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of intermittent alternating maintenance of propofol and sevoflurane on the clinical effect of patients with long-time general anesthesia.Methods A total of 90 patients with elective abdominal surgery from June 2023 to June 2024 were selected and divided into three groups (n=30) by computer random number table method,propofol intravenous maintenance group (group A),propofol combined with sevoflurane maintenance group ( group B) and intermittently maintenance of propofol and sevoflurane group (group C).All patients underwent tracheal intubation after routine intravenous induction, with 30 cases in each group.Group A was maintained by propofol and remifentanil,group B was maintained by propofol combined with sevoflurane and remifentanil,and group C was maintained by propofol alternate with sevoflurane and remifentanil.The dosage of each anesthesia drug,the recovery time of breathing,awareness time,extubation time and the total recovery time after the operation were recorded,and the restlessness at recovery (RS) score and Ramsay sedation score were evaluated.Adverse events and complications were recorded.Postoperative ICU stay,total hospital stay,and hospitalization expenses were also counted.Results The doses of propofol in groups A,B,and C were (1 740.3±385.6) mg,(1 243.2±278.5) mg and (1 055.1±245.8) mg,respectively,and the doses of sevoflurane in groups B and C were (39.83±9.20) mg and (28.33±4.25) mg,respectively.Compared with group A and B,group C used less propofol and sevoflurane (P<0.05).Postoperatively,patients in group C had shorter recovery times for spontaneous breathing [(15.43±14.90)min],consciousness awakening [(15.90±14.59)min],extubation [(42.82±37.23)min],and total recovery time [(44.03±12.68)min] than those in group A[(56.73±47.23)min,(57.03±47.83)min,(66.43±47.94)min and(93.80±48.68)min] and group B[(31.57±26.04)min,(31.17±26.06)min,(39.60±26.30)min and(65.43±34.18)min] (P<0.05).The RS scores for groups A,B,and C were (1.33±0.92),(0.83±0.70),and (0.33±0.55),respectively,and the Ramsay sedation scores were (2.87±0.94),(2.43±0.73),and (1.90±0.40),respectively,showing a gradual decrease (P<0.05).The incidences of postoperative choking cough, restlessness, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension in group A were 26.7%, 36.7%, 23.3%, and 30% respectively, and those in group C were 6.7%, 6.7%,3.3%,and 10% respectively. The incidences in group C were all lower than those in group A, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Furthermore,compared with group A[(2.53±1.14)d,(25.53±13.17)d and(93 200±19 800)CNY],group C had shorter ICU stays [(1.50±0.68)d] and hospitalization durations [(20.37±6.67)d],and lower hospitalization costs [(84800±10700)CNY] (P<0.05).Conclusion Propofol and sevoflurane intermittently maintenance can be safely and effectively used for long-time anesthesia maintenance.Compared with traditional total intravenous and intravenous combined with inhalation anesthesia,the recovery is faster,the recovery quality is better,and the hospitalization time and cost can be optimized.

Key words: propofol; sevoflurane; intermittent alternation; quality of recovery; general anesthesia

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[2] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[3] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[4] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[5] 张业强;晏大学;高小见 . 急诊肋骨内固定手术对严重连枷胸患者恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 794 .
[6] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[7] 金鑫;周鹏;赵文超;等. 肾脏混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[8] 危常鹏 . 原发性乳腺淋巴瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 806 .
[9] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[10] 应敏刚;杨春康. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症的防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 819 .