临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 266-270.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.03.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胸腔镜下肺叶切除、解剖性肺段切除、肺楔形切除治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析

万伟 张彬 刘勇志 井淼 王晓栋   

  1. 610065 成都,西部战区空军医院心胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-23 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 王晓栋,Email:2671074974@qq.com

Efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy,anatomic segmentectomy and wedge resection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

WAN Wei,ZHANG Bin,LIU YongZhi,JING Miao,WANG Xiaodong   

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Air Force Hospital of the Western Theater Command,Sichun,Chengdu 610065,China
  • Received:2023-03-23 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-20

摘要: 目的 比较胸腔镜下肺叶切除、解剖性肺段切除、肺楔形切除手术治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法 选取2017年8月~2019年8月我院收治的NSCLC病人81例,采用随机数字表法将病人分为肺叶切除组、肺段切除组、肺楔形切除组,每组各27例,对比三组病人的手术具体情况(包括围术期情况、肺功能、炎症因子、免疫功能、并发症)及预后情况(术后3年复发率、远处转移率)。结果 与肺叶切除组比较,肺段切除组手术时长、引流量、住院时间显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与肺段切除组比较,肺楔形切除组手术时长、引流量、住院时间显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术前,三组各免疫功能指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后4周,肺段切除组CD4+、CD4+/CD8+、用力肺活量(FVC)值、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)值、每分钟最大通气量(MVV) 、一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)高于肺叶切除组,CD8+、白细胞介素(IL)-6、C反应蛋白(CRP)低于肺叶切除组,肺楔形切除组CD4+、CD4+/CD8+、FVC值、FEV1值、MVV 、DLCO高于肺段切除组,CD8+、IL-6、CRP低于肺段切除组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组术后3年远处转移率、复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。与肺叶切除组比较,肺楔形切除组与肺段切除组术后各种并发症发生率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 三种手术方式中,肺楔形切除对NSCLC病人肺功能、炎症、免疫的不利影响相对较小,术后恢复相对较快,其次为解剖性肺段切除,最后为肺叶切除,三组并发症发生率和远期预后比较无明显差异。

关键词: 胸腔镜;肺叶切除;解剖性肺段切除;肺楔形切除;非小细胞肺癌

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic lobectomy,wedge resection and anatomical segmental resection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods 81 patients with NSCLC admitted to our hospital from August 2017 to August 2019 were randomly divided into lobectomy group,segmental resection group and wedge resection group,with 27 patients in each group.The operation conditions (including perioperative conditions,lung function,inflammatory factors,immune function,complications) and prognosis (3-year recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate) of the three groups were compared.Results Compared with the lobectomy group,the specific operation time,drainage volume,and hospitalization days of the segmentectomy group were significantly reduced(P<0.05).Compared with the segmentectomy group,the specific operation time,drainage volume,and hospitalization days of the wedge resection group were significantly reduced(P<0.05).Before surgery,there was no difference in immune function indicators among the three groups(P>0.05).Four weeks after operation,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+,forced vital capacity(FVC),forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV1),maximum ventilation volume per minute(MVV),and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity(DLCO)in the segmentectomy group were significantly higher than those in the lobectomy group(P<0.05),CD8+,interleukin-6(IL-6),and C-reactive protein(CRP)in the segmentectomy group were significantly lower than those in the lobectomy group(P<0.05).CD4+,CD4+/CD8+,FVC,FEV1,MVV,and DLCO in the wedge resection group were significantly higher than those in the segmentectomy group(P<0.05),and CD8+,IL-6,and CRP in the wedge resection group were significantly lower than those in the segmentectomy group(P<0.05).There was no difference in the 3-year distant metastasis rate and recurrence rate among the three groups(P>0.05).Compared with the lobectomy group,the incidence of various postoperative complications in the wedge resection group and segmental resection group was slightly lower,but there was no difference in comparison (P>0.05).Conclusion Among the three surgical methods,pulmonary wedge resection has relatively small adverse effects on lung function,inflammation and immunity of NSCLC patients,and the postoperative recovery is relatively fast,followed by anatomical segmental resection,and finally lobectomy.There is no significant difference in complications and long-term prognosis among the three.

Key words: thoracoscope; lobectomy; anatomical segmental resection of lung; lung wedge resection; non-small cell lung cancer

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!