临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 188-191.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.02.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

XELOX方案新辅助化疗治疗Ⅱ(T4)期、Ⅲ期结肠癌的疗效分析

  

  1. 710038   西安,空军军医大学第二附属医院(唐都医院)普通外科(王少怡); 联勤保障部队第九〇九医院(厦门大学医学院附属东南医院)普通外科(聂凯、李冉冉、陈达丰、薛小军、叶磊、刘建平、 周松)
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-22 修回日期:2023-04-22 接受日期:2023-04-22 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 周松,Email:zscxy@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2020J01133)

Efficacy of XELOX regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage Ⅱ(T4) and Ⅲ colon cancer

  1. Department of General Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Airforce Military Medical University,Xi’an 710038,China
  • Received:2023-04-22 Revised:2023-04-22 Accepted:2023-04-22 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-02-20

摘要: 目的 评价XELOX方案新辅助化疗治疗Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期结肠癌的疗效。方法 2012年1月1日~2021年1月1日,我院收治的临床Ⅱ(T4)期、Ⅲ期结肠癌病人50例,均接受腹腔镜根治术治疗。根据病人是否接受XELOX方案新辅助化疗分为新辅助化疗组(NACT)和辅助化疗(ACT)组。比较两组化疗不良反应、手术并发症、手术时长、手术出血量、住院时长、住院费用、肿瘤标志物转阴率、肿瘤缓解率、肿瘤降期率、化疗后肿瘤反应等级、术后无病生存曲线、总生存曲线。结果 两组手术并发症、术后排气时间、住院时长比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NACT组化疗不良反应、术后CEA、CA19-9转阴率、手术时长、手术出血量、住院费用优于ACT组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在DFS、OS生存曲线上,随着时间的延长,NACT生存曲线下降的幅度小于ACT组。DFS比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),OS比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 XELOX方案新辅助化疗治疗Ⅱ(T4)期、Ⅲ期结肠癌,安全、有效。

关键词: 新辅助化疗, 结肠癌, 辅助化疗

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of XELOX regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ colon cancer.Methods The clinical data of 50 patients with clinical stage Ⅱ(T4)  Ⅲ colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection at general surgery department of our hospital from January 1,2012 to January 1,2021 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (ACT) according to whether they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX regimen.The general clinical data,adverse reactions of chemotherapy,surgical complications,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,hospitalization cost,negative conversion rate of tumor markers,tumor remission rate,tumor downstaging rate,tumor response grade after chemotherapy,postoperative diseasefree survival curve,and overall survival curve were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the groups.Objective To evaluate the efficacy of XELOX regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ colon cancer.Methods The clinical data of 50 patients with clinical stage Ⅱ(T4)  Ⅲ colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection at general surgery department of our hospital from January 1,2012 to January 1,2021 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (ACT) according to whether they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX regimen.The general clinical data,adverse reactions of chemotherapy,surgical complications,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,hospitalization cost,negative conversion rate of tumor markers,tumor remission rate,tumor downstaging rate,tumor response grade after chemotherapy,postoperative disease-free survival curve,and overall survival curve were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the groups.Results There were no significant differences in operative complications,postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay between NACT group and ACT group (P>0.05).The adverse reactions of chemotherapy,the negative conversion rate of postoperative CEA and CA19-9,the duration of operation,the amount of bleeding,and the hospitalization cost in NACT group were significantly better than those in ACT group (P<0.05).In terms of DFS and OS survival curves,with the extension of time,the decline of the NACT survival curve was smaller than that of the ACT group,and there was a significant difference in DFS survival curve (P<0.05),but no significant difference in OS survival curve (P>0.05).Conclusion XELOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and effective in the treatment of stage Ⅱ (T4) and stage Ⅲ  colon cancer.There were no significant differences in operative complications,postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay between NACT group and ACT group (P>0.05).The adverse reactions of chemotherapy,the negative conversion rate of postoperative CEA and CA19-9,the duration of operation,the amount of bleeding,and the hospitalization cost in NACT group were significantly better than those in ACT group (P<0.05).In terms of DFS and OS survival curves,with the extension of time,the decline of the NACT survival curve was smaller than that of the ACT group,and there was a significant difference in DFS survival curve (P<0.05),but no significant difference in OS survival curve (P>0.05).Conclusion  XELOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and effective in the treatment of stage Ⅱ (T4) and stage Ⅲ  colon cancer.

Key words: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy

[1] 李阳 刘涛 曾立鹏 胡元祥 . 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术后胃瘫综合征29例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 196-198.
[2] 王青峰 陆晶晶 鲁生林 汪源 吴永丰 张明府. 新辅助化疗后行腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症有关影响因素及预后分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 860-863.
[3] 丁辉斌 周红飞. 经尾侧联合中线入路与中线入路在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的应用效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 869-872.
[4] 孙飞 周家权 王飞. 组织RNA聚合酶III亚基G表达增加预测肌层浸润性膀胱癌辅助化疗反应和预后不良[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 763-767.
[5] 李大伟 夏世辉. Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌病人新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗后无病生存的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 626-629.
[6] 王健 钱群 吴云华. 结肠癌穿孔术后类白血病反应一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 579-580.
[7] 陈勇伟 李昊 黄力 陈从波 王黎 姚启盛. 新辅助化疗联合经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术对膀胱癌病人肿瘤直径、尿液膀胱肿瘤抗原水平及复发率的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 152-155.
[8] 周硕 王振杰 孙万亮 张登勇 鲁正. 高龄结肠癌病人中CDH13的表达变化与临床及预后相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 181-184.
[9] 马松鹤 罗建飞 赵晶. 尾内侧入路联合中间翻页式淋巴结清扫在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1176-1179.
[10] 殷军锋 顾明. 沉默circ_0007385对结肠癌细胞增殖、迁移及凋亡的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 762-766.
[11] 廖良功 胡俊杰 张弛 徐鹏飞 叶盛威 熊治国 . 原发性横结肠肝曲腺鳞癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 797-798.
[12] 刘珊 刘鑫 林友刚. GATA3/GATA6调控结肠癌细胞株自噬和增殖的机制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 694-696.
[13] 李栋梁 罗建飞. 局部进展期Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌新辅助化疗后腹腔镜手术及开放手术的临床对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 429-432.
[14] 金成龙 张建国. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 386-389.
[15] 朱栋良 黎尉浩 严海东 尹小平 田晓玲. 阿帕替尼对结肠癌细胞侵袭能力的影响及其分子机制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 179-181.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 栾杰. 当前国内乳房再造的几个原则与技术问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1101 -1102 .
[2] 何雨竹, 倪鑫, 张潍平. 儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻性肾积水手术治疗策略研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 501 -504 .
[3] 马先桃 李师亮 严丽 朱章强 冯异 程才. 杂交技术在StanfordA型主动脉夹层的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1101 -1103 .
[4] 闵心平 夏军 朱铁源 胡知朋 李博文 徐鹏 王志维. 急性重症肺栓塞外科治疗八例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1132 -1134 .
[5] 李疆 曹英豪 邓胜和 蔡开琳. 胃下部癌No.6组淋巴结分拣特点和转移危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 830 -834 .
[6] 解东阳 张兵强 李韶山. 基于SEER数据库的壶腹周围癌预后预测模型的构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 659 -665 .
[7] 梁宾勇 陈孝平. 免疫治疗时代肝癌外科治疗的机遇与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(10): 901 -903 .
[8] 魏萌萌 吕志坤 李国珍 胡雪艳 许倩倩 郭静 耿彪. 血清血管生成素样蛋白8、血管细胞黏附分子-1水平联合检测对颅内动脉瘤栓塞术后脑血管痉挛的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1133 -1136 .
[9] 方滢 叶哲伟 陈孝平. 科学技术对现代外科学发展的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 1 -5 .
[10] 瞿伟峰 史颖弘 樊嘉. 美国国立综合癌症网络临床实践指南:肝细胞癌(2023.V2)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 6 -9 .