临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 780-782.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.08.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声引导下不同入路坐骨神经阻滞在踝部骨折病人麻醉中的应用

  

  1. 362000 福建省泉州市海峡医院麻醉科 
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-08 接受日期:2022-03-08 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 李巧云,Email:66841621@qq.com

Application of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block in anesthesia for patients with ankle fracture

  1. *Department of Anesthesiology,Strait Hospital,Quanzhou City,Fujian Province,Quanzhou 362000,China
  • Received:2022-03-08 Accepted:2022-03-08 Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-08-20

摘要: 目的 在踝部骨折的麻醉过程中采用超声引导下不同入路的坐骨神经阻滞,分析麻醉的安全性与有效性。方法 2020年6月~2021年6月我院收治的踝部骨折病人176例,根据入路方式不同分为两组,P组92例,采用腘窝上入路(PA)坐骨神经阻滞;G组84例,采用股骨大转子平面入路(GTA)坐骨神经阻滞,比较两组神经阻滞操作时间、起效时间、坐骨神经深度和疼痛评分。结果 P组和G组神经阻滞操作时间分别为(3.16±0.68 )分钟和(6.07±0.94)分钟,起效时间分别为(1.46±0.36 )分钟和( 2.18±0.43)分钟,坐骨神经深度分别为(2.76±0.32)cm和(3.45±0.58)cm,神经阻滞维持时间分别为(571.27±37.43 )分钟和(440.42±31.16)分钟,踝部疼痛评分分别为1.21±0.36 和2.26±0.46,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);P组病人的Ⅲ级及以上肌力占比优于G组(97.83%和8.33%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在踝部骨折病人中采用超声引导下PA坐骨神经阻滞在缓解疼痛症状、维持肌群肌力及规避运动阻滞等方面疗效满意;可简化手术操作,规避手术创伤对康复的影响。

关键词: 超声引导, 腘窝上入路, 股骨大转子平面入路, 坐骨神经阻滞, 踝部骨折

Abstract: Objective During the anesthesia of ankle fractures,ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with different approaches is used to analyze the safety and effectiveness of anesthesia.Methods A retrospective analysis of 176 patients with ankle fractures admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to June 2021,patients in group P received sciatic nerve block(PA) in the superior popliteal approach(PA,92 cases),and patients in group G received The sciatic nerve block of the greater trochanteric plane approach(GTA)(84 cases).The operation time, onset time, sciatic nerve depth and pain score of nerve block were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of nerve block[(3.16±0.68)min vs (6.07±0.94)min],onset time[(1.46±0.36)min vs (2.18±0.43)min] and sciatic nerve depth[(2.76±0.32)cm vs (3.45±0.58)cm] of patients between group P and group G were significant(P<0.05),the maintenance time of nerve blockin group P[(571.27±37.43)min vs (440.42±31.16)min] was significantly better than that in group G(P<0.05).The ankle pain score of patients in group P was significantly lower than that in group G(1.21±0.36 vs 2.26±0.46)(P<0.05);the proportion of muscle strength of grade Ⅲ and above patients in group P was significantly better than that in group G(97.83% vs 8.33%)(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of ultrasound-guided PA sciatic nerve block in patients with ankle fracture is satisfactory in relieving pain symptoms,maintaining muscle strength,and avoiding motor block.It can also effectively simplify surgical operations and avoid surgical trauma to rehabilitation influence.

Key words: ultrasound guidance, popliteal approach, greater trochanteric approach, sciatic nerve block, ankle fracture

[1] 刘琦 万玉文 李晓强. 椎管内麻醉联合超声引导下闭孔神经阻滞与全身麻醉相比对经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术病人术后肿瘤复发影响的临床研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 506-509.
[2] 陈默曦 高晓云 徐成 吴强 许涛 江伟. 不同剂量右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因腰丛阻滞应用于小儿髋关节手术的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 514-517.
[3] 吴豪 余挺 李麟 殷国江 谈世刚 夏中元. 超声引导法桡动脉置管对血管损伤并发症发生率及恢复情况的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 889-891.
[4] 周麟, 潘华锋, 李琰. 超声引导下经皮微波消融与无水酒精注射微创治疗囊实性良性甲状腺结节的临床疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 517-520.
[5] 沈柏儒, 宋长山, 吴旭辉等. 超声引导射频消融联合胸腔靶向灌注对肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(4): 363-366.
[6] 杨丽 朱荔 刘紫朦 鲍宝石 马金平 王建东. 超声引导下空芯针穿刺活检对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(3): 231-234.
[7] 刘苹 吴茜 王思桦 姚尚龙. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对保留自主呼吸的胸腔镜手术术后镇痛及应激反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 784-786.
[8] 陈超 梅伟. 超声引导外周神经阻滞在髋部骨折手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 391-393.
[9] 刘永琛, 宋牧野, 吴泽宇. 微创介入治疗在甲状腺疾病中的应用与争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 221-223.
[10] 王月 刘勇 周志强 陈堃 吴茜 梅伟. 超声引导L5-S1和L4-5间隙腰麻用于经尿道输尿管镜碎石术麻醉比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1174-1177.
[11] 陈小波, 舒爱华, 王强, 程传喜. 腰方肌阻滞对髂腹股沟入路骨盆和髋臼骨折手术术后静脉镇痛的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1082-1084.
[12] 轩继中, 程兆云, 葛振伟, 孙俊杰, 孟树萍, 赵亮, 林鹏辉, 王莹. 经食管超声引导下心脏异物取出术一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 57-58.
[13] 梅伟, 江伟. 超声引导区域麻醉的历史和发展展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 451-452.
[14] 徐诚实, 王庚. 超声定位神经阻滞在膝关节手术中的应用现状及争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 453-456.
[15] 康文彬, 李颖源, 周雪, 杨小宇, 冯霞. 腹横肌平面阻滞和腰方肌阻滞的效果对比[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 456-459.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!