临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 364-367.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.04.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞检测对肝细胞癌病人合并血管侵犯的诊断价值

  

  1. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院肝脏外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-06 接受日期:2022-03-06 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄志勇,Email:zyhuang126@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省科技创新专项(2021BCA115)

The diagnostic value of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells detection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion

  1. Department of Hepatic Surgery Center,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2022-03-06 Accepted:2022-03-06 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-20

摘要: 目的 探讨叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞(FR + CTCs)检测对肝细胞癌病人(HCC)合并血管侵犯的诊断价值。 方法 前瞻性收集2020年10月~2021年8月我院收治的HCC住院病人91例,利用免疫磁珠负向筛选+靶向荧光定量PCR法检测其外周血液中的FR + CTCs。根据病人术前影像学检查和术后病理结果分为无血管侵犯(NVI)组30例,微血管侵犯(MVI)组26例,门静脉癌栓(PVTT)组35例。分析3组病人FR + CTCs检测值差异。 结果 3组病人FR + CTCs检测值的平均水平分别为(10.52±2.21)FU/3 ml,(12.35±2.47)FU/3 ml,(14.79±3.68)FU/3 ml,3组比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。FR+CTCs检测值与HCC血管侵犯程度存在正相关性( r= 0.499 ,P <0.05)。分别以FR + CTCs作为有无血管侵犯和PVTT的辅助诊断指标,其ROC曲线下面积分别为0.769(95%CI为0.668~0.869)和0.830(95%CI为0.733~0.928);当分别取截断点为12.35 FU/3 ml和11.8 FU/3 ml时,其诊断灵敏度分别为0.672和0.829、特异度分别为0.767和0.733。 结论 FR + CTCs检测值与HCC血管侵犯程度存在正相关,FR + CTCs检测值对有无血管侵犯和PVTT有较高的辅助诊断价值,但对MVI诊断价值较低。

关键词: 循环肿瘤细胞, 叶酸受体, 肝细胞癌, 血管侵犯

Abstract: Objective To explore the diagnostic value of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells(FR+CTCs) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Methods From October 2020 to August 2021,91 cases of HCC in the Department of Liver Surgery of Tongji Hospital were prospectively collected,and the detection values of FR + CTCs in peripheral blood bodies were measured by immunomagnetic bead negative screening and targeted fluorescence quantitative PCR.The patients were divided into non-vascular invasion group (NVI)( n =30),microvascular invasion group (MVI)( n =26) and portal vein tumor thrombus group(PVTT)( n =35) according to preoperative imaging and postoperative pathological results.The difference of FR + CTCs among 3 groups was analyzed. Results The average values of FR + CTCs in the three groups were (10.52±2.21)FU/3 ml,(12.35±2.47)FU/3 ml,(14.79±3.68)FU/3 ml( P <0.05).There was a positive correlation between the detection value of FR + CTCs and the degree of vascular invasion in patients with HCC( r=0.499,P <0.05).FR + CTCs were used as auxiliary diagnostic indicators for vascular invasion and PVTT,and the area under the ROC curve was 0.769 (95%CI was 0.668-0.869) and 0.830(95%CI was 0.733-0.928),respectively.When the cut-off points were 12.35 FU/3 ml and 11.8 FU/3 ml,respectively,the diagnostic sensitivity was  0.672  and 0.829,and the specificity was 0.767 and 0.733,respectively. Conclusion The detection value of FR + CTCs was positively correlated with the degree of vascular invasion in HCC patients,and the detection value of FR + CTCs had higher auxiliary diagnostic value for patients with vascular invasion and PVTT,but lower diagnostic value for MVI in patients with HCC.

Key words: circulating tumor cells, folate receptor, hepatocellular carcinoma, vascular invasion

[1] 熊光冰 王敏 朱峰 秦仁义. 液态活检在胰腺癌早期诊断中的作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 679-683.
[2] 黄成 孙惠川. 中晚期肝癌的根治之路——转化治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1008-1011.
[3] 陈继业 苏明 韩骏 蔡守旺. 腹腔镜解剖性肝段切除探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1018-1021.
[4] 刘志承 郭傧 周一 肖震宇. 肝细胞癌围手术期辅助治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1022-1024.
[5] 李江 黄志勇. 肝癌免疫微环境与免疫治疗研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1089-1091.
[6] 张维义 夏维 苑广超 王芳 江辉 范李. 七氟烷通过BACE1-AS和糖酵解途径抑制肝癌细胞的增殖及侵袭迁移[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(10): 985-989.
[7] 黄志勇 古今 陈孝平. 科学肝切除-新时代肝癌肝切除的思考[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 1-3.
[8] 张志伟 陈孝平. 肝细胞癌外科手术方式的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 4-6.
[9] 陈继业, 蔡守旺. 解剖性肝S8段切除手术策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 649-651.
[10] 轩志强, 史炼钢, 赵国华, 孙琳. 腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝癌病人的效果及对应激反应、T淋巴细胞的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 898-900.
[11] 李雪 杨小玲 胡秋兰 黄明君 汪晓东 李卡. 血管侵犯与结肠癌术后三年预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 99-99.
[12] 朱智 易继林 陈钢 李兴睿 杨志芳 沈文状 杨筱嵬. EphrinA1在肝细胞癌患者内皮祖细胞中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(11): 742-742.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!