临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 771-775.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20251036

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

自控式胸部物理康复治疗对缓解非连枷胸多发肋骨骨折急性疼痛的短期疗效观察

高威,俞若婷,刘宇浩,方泽民,雷锦林,李笑东,王贤和,黄旭东   

  1. 430000 湖北武汉,武汉科技大学附属天佑医院心胸外科(高威、俞若婷、刘宇浩、雷锦林、李笑东、王贤和、黄旭东、方泽民);华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院心脏大血管外科(方泽民)
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-16 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 高威,Email:gw20211101@163.com
  • 作者简介:高威,Email:gw20211101@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82270512);湖北省教育厅科学研究计划项目(B2022003);2024年武汉科技大学研究生创新创业基金项目(JCX2024040)

Observation on the short-term therapeutic effect of self-controlled physical rehabilitation therapy of chest in alleviating acute pain in multiple rib fractures without flail chest

GAO Wei, YU Ruoting, LIU Yuhao, FANG Zemin, LEI Jinlin, LI Xiaodong, WANG Xianhe, HUANG Xudong   

  1. *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tianyou Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2025-11-16 Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨自控式胸部物理康复治疗(SPRC)缓解钝性胸外伤非连枷胸多发肋骨骨折病人急性疼痛的可行性、安全性和有效性。方法 2023年1月~2024年12月收治的钝性胸外伤致非连枷胸多发肋骨骨折病人180例,根据治疗方法分为观察组(91例)和对照组(89例)。自入院第二天开始观察组按照SPRC方法进行系统康复治疗,对照组按照常规方法治疗。比较两组追加止痛药物、每日静息和最重视觉模拟评分(VAS)、停止观察选择行肋骨骨折内固定手术例数以及并发症情况。结果 观察组和对照组入院第二天追加止痛药物的病人例数分别为16例(17.6%)和28例(31.5%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组入院第三天静息VAS评分分别为(2.85±0.71)分和(3.16±0.69)分,第四天静息VAS评分分别为(2.27±0.65 )分和(2.56±0.85)分,观察组和对照组入院第三天最重VAS评分分别为(6.53±0.94)分和(6.87±0.89)分,入院第四天最重VAS评分分别为(5.49±1.02 )分和(6.00±1.15)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组停止观察选择行肋骨骨折内固定病人数量分别为14例(15.4%)和23例(25.8%),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 SPRC缓解钝性胸外伤非连枷胸多发肋骨骨折病人急性疼痛可行、安全和有效,且优于常规治疗方法。

关键词: 自控式胸部物理康复治疗, 钝性胸外伤, 非连枷胸, 多发肋骨骨折, 缓解急性疼痛

Abstract: Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of self-controlled physical rehabilitation therapy of chest (SPRC) in alleviating acute pain in hospitalized patients with multiple rib fractures of non-flail chest caused by blunt chest trauma.Methods From January 2023 to December 2024, 180 patients with multiple rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma were admitted.They were divided into the observation group(91 cases) and the control group(89 cases) based on the treatment methods.There was no significant difference in the basic conditions between the two groups (P>0.05).Starting from the second day after admission, the observation group received systematic rehabilitation treatment according to the SPRC method, while the control group received treatment according to the conventional method.Compare the number of patients who received additional analgesic drugs, the daily resting VAS score and the maximum VAS score, the number of patients who stopped observation and chose to undergo internal fixation surgery for rib fractures, as well as the complications.Results The number of patients who received additional analgesic drugs on the second day of admission was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group[16 cases(17.6%)vs.28 cases(31.5%)] (P<0.05).The resting VAS scores of the observation group and the control group on the third day of admission were (2.85±0.71) points and (3.16± 0.69) points respectively, and on the fourth day, they were (2.27±0.65) points and (2.56±0.85) points respectively.The heaviest VAS scores on the third day of admission in the observation group and the control group were (6.53 ±0.94) points and (6.87±0.89) points respectively, and the heaviest VAS scores on the fourth day of admission were (5.49±1.02) points and (6.00±1.15) points respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The number of patients who underwent internal fixation for rib fractures in the observation group and the control group was 14 cases (15.4%) and 23 cases (25.8%), respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The SPRC method is feasible, safe and effective in alleviating acute pain in patients with multiple rib fractures of non-flail chest caused by blunt thoracic trauma, and is superior to conventional treatment methods.

Key words: self-controlled physical rehabilitation, blunt thoracic trauma, non-flail chest, multiple rib fractures, relieve acute pain

[1] 张淼;张辉. 胸部记忆肋骨护板外固定治疗多发肋骨骨折41例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 889-890.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!